Three-dimensional motion perception: comparing speed and speed change discrimination for looming stimuli

Autor: Abigail Lee, Julie M. Harris, Justin M. Ales
Přispěvatelé: BBSRC, University of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
BF Psychology
Computer science
Cognitive Neuroscience
media_common.quotation_subject
ComputingMethodologies_IMAGEPROCESSINGANDCOMPUTERVISION
BF
Stimulus (physiology)
Article
050105 experimental psychology
Motion (physics)
Task (project management)
Speed change discrimination
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
speed change discrimination
Looming
looming
motion in depth
Perception
Motion in depth
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
lcsh:QH301-705.5
Speed discrimination
media_common
05 social sciences
DAS
Cell Biology
Sensory Systems
Ophthalmology
Interval (music)
lcsh:Biology (General)
Duration (music)
RC0321
Three dimensional motion
speed discrimination
Depth perception
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Optometry
Cognitive psychology
Zdroj: Vision
Volume 4
Issue 3
Vision, Vol 4, Iss 33, p 33 (2020)
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.03.023879
Popis: Judging the speed of objects moving in three dimensions is important in our everyday lives because we interact with objects in a three-dimensional world. However, speed perception has been seldom studied for motion in depth, particularly when using monocular cues such as looming. Here, we compared speed discrimination, and speed change discrimination, for looming stimuli, in order to better understand what visual information is used for these tasks. For the speed discrimination task, we manipulated the distance and duration information available, in order to investigate if participants were specifically using speed information. For speed change discrimination, total distance and duration were held constant
hence, they could not be used to successfully perform that task. For the speed change discrimination task, our data were consistent with observers not responding specifically to speed changes within an interval. Instead, they may have used alternative, arguably less optimal, strategies to complete the task. Evidence suggested that participants used a variety of cues to complete the speed discrimination task, not always solely relying on speed. Further, our data suggested that participants may have switched between cues on a trial to trial basis. We conclude that speed changes in looming stimuli were not used in a speed change discrimination task, and that naï
ve participants may not always exclusively use speed for speed discrimination.
Databáze: OpenAIRE