Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?
Autor: | J van Engelshoven, Robert Landewé, L Heuft-Dorenbosch, G. J. C. Schulpen, D. van der Heijde, Sj van der Linden, R Wijers, A. van Tubergen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Other departments |
Rok vydání: | 2003 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty health care facilities manpower and services Radiography Immunology Sensitivity and Specificity General Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology Computed tomographic Rheumatology immune system diseases health services administration Internal medicine medicine Humans Immunology and Allergy skin and connective tissue diseases Netherlands Observer Variation Sacroiliac joint Ankylosing spondylitis Training set business.industry Arthritis Sacroiliitis Sacroiliac Joint Middle Aged medicine.disease Extended Report Improved performance medicine.anatomical_structure Education Medical Continuing Female Clinical Competence Radiology Tomography X-Ray Computed business |
Zdroj: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 62(6), 519-525. BMJ Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 0003-4967 |
DOI: | 10.1136/ard.62.6.519 |
Popis: | To assess performance of radiologists and rheumatologists in detecting sacroiliitis 100 rheumatologists and 23 radiologists participated. One set of films was used for each assessment, another for training, and the third for confidence judgment. Films of HLA-B27+ patients with AS were used to assess sensitivity. For specificity films of healthy HLA-B27- relatives were included. Plain sacroiliac (SI) films with simultaneously taken computed tomographic scans (CTs) were used for confidence judgment. Three months after reading the training set, sensitivity and specificity assessments were repeated. Next, participants attended a workshop. They also rated 26 SI radiographs and 26 CTs for their trust in each judgment. Three months later final assessments were done. Sensitivity (84.3%/79.8%) and specificity (70.6%/74.7%) for radiologists and rheumatologists were comparable. Rheumatologists showed 6.3% decrease in sensitivity after self education (p=0.001), but 3.0% better specificity (p=0.008). The decrease in sensitivity reversed after the workshop. Difference in sensitivity three months after the workshop and baseline was only 0.5%. Sensitivity 5% in both sensitivity and specificity. Intraobserver agreement for sacroiliitis grade 1 or 2 ranged from 65% to 100%. Sensitivity for CT (86%) was higher than for plain films (72%) (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |