How to intervene in the caries process in adults: proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement
Autor: | Christian H. Splieth, Vita Machiulskiene, Avijit Banerjee, Guglielmo Campus, Kim R. Ekstrand, Rainer Haak, Peter Bottenberg, David J. Manton, Adrian Lussi, Rodrigo A. Giacaman, Lorenzo Breschi, Reinhard Hickel, Hrvoje Jurić, Sophie Doméjean, Andrea Ferreira Zandona, Matthias Hannig, Anahita Jablonski-Momeni, Hervé Tassery, Domenick T. Zero, Falk Schwendicke, Niek J.M. Opdam, Sebastian Paris, Ruth M. Santamaría, Stefan Zimmer |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique (CROC), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020]), CHU Estaing [Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Laboratoire de Bioingénierie et NanoSciences (LBN), Université de Montpellier (UM), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Surgical clinical sciences, Oral Health, Dentistry, Dental Clinic, Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Schwendicke F., Splieth C.H., Bottenberg P., Breschi L., Campus G., Domejean S., Ekstrand K., Giacaman R.A., Haak R., Hannig M., Hickel R., Juric H., Lussi A., Machiulskiene V., Manton D., Jablonski-Momeni A., Opdam N., Paris S., Santamaria R., Tassery H., Zandona A., Zero D., Zimmer S., Banerjee A. |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Delphi Technique Dentistry PROGRESSION Recommendations MARGINAL INTEGRITY 0302 clinical medicine Caries Medicine LONGEVITY Fluoride 610 Medicine & health Consensus conference Interdental consonant Carie Systematic review Restoration medicine.symptom 600 Technik Medizin angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit Human Adult Consensus Consensu Restorations [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer engineering.material Dental Caries Lower risk Oral hygiene Dental Material Lesion 03 medical and health sciences Dental Materials All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center Humans Dental Enamel General Dentistry COMPOSITE LESIONS business.industry Dentistry(all) caries consensus decision-making fluoride infiltration recommendations restorations sealing Sealing Infiltration 030206 dentistry Recommendation Oral Hygiene APPROXIMAL CARIES Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10] Amalgam (dentistry) AMALGAM 030104 developmental biology engineering [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie Best evidence business [SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition Decision-making |
Zdroj: | Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 3315-3321 Clinical Oral Investigations Clinical Oral Investigations, Springer Verlag, 2020, 24 (9), pp.3315-3321. ⟨10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0⟩ Schwendicke, Falk; Splieth, Christian H; Bottenberg, Peter; Breschi, Lorenzo; Campus, Guglielmo; Doméjean, Sophie; Ekstrand, Kim; Giacaman, Rodrigo A; Haak, Rainer; Hannig, Matthias; Hickel, Reinhard; Juric, Hrvoje; Lussi, Adrian; Machiulskiene, Vita; Manton, David; Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita; Opdam, Niek; Paris, Sebastian; Santamaria, Ruth; Tassery, Hervé; ... (2020). How to intervene in the caries process in adults: proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement. Clinical oral investigations, 24(9), pp. 3315-3321. Springer-Verlag 10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 Schwendicke, F, Splieth, C H, Bottenberg, P, Breschi, L, Campus, G, Doméjean, S, Ekstrand, K, Giacaman, R A, Haak, R, Hannig, M, Hickel, R, Juric, H, Lussi, A, Machiulskiene, V, Manton, D, Jablonski-Momeni, A, Opdam, N, Paris, S, Santamaria, R, Tassery, H, Zandona, A, Zero, D, Zimmer, S & Banerjee, A 2020, ' How to intervene in the caries process in adults : proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement ', Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 3315-3321 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 Clinical Oral Investigations, 24(9), 3315-3321. SPRINGER HEIDELBERG Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 9, pp. 3315-3321 |
ISSN: | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0⟩ |
Popis: | Objectives To provide consensus recommendations on how to intervene in the caries process in adults, specifically proximal and secondary carious lesions. Methods Based on two systematic reviews, a consensus conference and followed by an e-Delphi consensus process were held with EFCD/ORCA/DGZ delegates. Results Managing an individual’s caries risk using non-invasive means (oral hygiene measures including flossing/interdental brushes, fluoride application) is recommended, as both proximal and secondary carious lesions may be prevented or their activity reduced. For proximal lesions, only cavitated lesions (confirmed by visual-tactile, or radiographically extending into the middle/inner dentine third) should be treated invasively/restoratively. Non-cavitated lesions may be successfully arrested using non-invasive measures in low-risk individuals or if radiographically confined to the enamel. In high-risk individuals or if radiographically extended into dentine, for these lesions, additional micro-invasive (lesion sealing and infiltration) treatment should be considered. For restoring proximal lesions, adhesive direct restorations allow minimally invasive, tooth-preserving preparations. Amalgams come with a lower risk of secondary lesions and may be preferable in more clinically complex scenarios, dependent on specific national guidelines. In structurally compromised (especially endodontically treated) teeth, indirect cuspal coverage restorations may be indicated. Detection methods for secondary lesions should be tailored according to the individual’s caries risk. Avoiding false positive detection and over-treatment is a priority. Bitewing radiographs should be combined with visual-tactile assessment to confirm secondary caries detections. Review/refurbishing/resealing/repairing instead of replacing partially defective restorations should be considered for managing secondary caries, if possible. Conclusions An individualized and lesion-specific approach is recommended for intervening in the caries process in adults. Clinical significance Dental clinicians have an increasing number of interventions available for the management of dental caries. Many of them are grounded in the growing understanding of the disease. The best evidence, patients’ expectations, clinicians’ expertise, and the individual clinical scenario all need to be considered during the decision-making process. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |