MGMT Promoter Methylation Cutoff with Safety Margin for Selecting Glioblastoma Patients into Trials Omitting Temozolomide. A Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials

Autor: L. Burt Nabors, Thierry Gorlia, J. Straub, Olivier Chinot, Els Genbrugge, Monika E. Hegi, Mark R. Gilbert, Greg Jones, Wim Van Criekinge, Roger Stupp, Michael Weller
Přispěvatelé: University of Zurich, Hegi, Monika E
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Bevacizumab
610 Medicine & health
Article
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Internal medicine
medicine
Cutoff
1306 Cancer Research
Temozolomide
Receiver operating characteristic
business.industry
Standard treatment
Antineoplastic Agents
Alkylating/pharmacology

Antineoplastic Agents
Alkylating/therapeutic use

Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy
Brain Neoplasms/genetics
Clinical Trials as Topic
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases/genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics
Datasets as Topic
Drug Resistance
Neoplasm/genetics

Female
Glioblastoma/drug therapy
Glioblastoma/genetics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Promoter Regions
Genetic/genetics

Reference Values
Temozolomide/pharmacology
Temozolomide/therapeutic use
Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics
10040 Clinic for Neurology
Clinical trial
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
DNA methylation
2730 Oncology
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
medicine.drug
Zdroj: Clin Cancer Res
Clinical cancer research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1809-1816
Popis: Purpose: The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is predictive for benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma (GBM). A clinically optimized cutoff was sought allowing patient selection for therapy without temozolomide, while avoiding to withhold it from patients who may potentially benefit. Experimental Design: Quantitative MGMT methylation-specific PCR data were obtained for newly diagnosed patients with GBM screened or treated with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide in four randomized trials. The pooled dataset was randomly split into a training and test dataset. The unsupervised cutoff was obtained at a 50% probability to be (un)methylated. ROC analysis identified an optimal cutoff supervised by overall survival (OS). Results: For 4,041 patients valid MGMT results were obtained, whereof 1,725 were randomized. The unsupervised cutoff in the training dataset was 1.27 (log2[1,000 × (MGMT+1)/ACTB]), separating unmethylated and methylated patients. The optimal supervised cutoff for unmethylated patients was −0.28 (AUC = 0.61), classifying “truly unmethylated” (≤−0.28) and “gray zone” patients (>−0.28, ≤1.27), the latter comprising approximately 10% of cases. In contrast, for patients with MGMT methylation (>1.27) more methylation was not related to better outcome. Both methylated and gray zone patients performed significantly better for OS than truly unmethylated patients [HR = 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27–0.45, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.43–0.78, P < 0.001], validated in the test dataset. The MGMT assay was highly reproducible upon retesting of 218 paired samples (R2 = 0.94). Conclusions: Low MGMT methylation (gray zone) may confer some sensitivity to temozolomide treatment, hence the lower safety margin should be considered for selecting patients with unmethylated GBM into trials omitting temozolomide.
Databáze: OpenAIRE