The management of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas in well functioning renal transplanted patients: Many doubts, few certainties
| Autor: | Manca Em, G.B. Piredda, G F Pili, F. Lo Jacono, F. Logias, O Manca, A Barracca, G.L. Pisano, P. Carta |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry Fistula medicine.medical_treatment 030232 urology & nephrology Arteriovenous fistula Retrospective cohort study 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology medicine.disease Thrombosis Surgery Transplantation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Nephrology Heart failure medicine Hemodialysis business Dialysis |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Vascular Access. 6:182-186 |
| ISSN: | 1724-6032 1129-7298 |
| Popis: | Vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis (HD) is one of the most important clinical problems in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients because it can limit a life support system and can influence long-term dialysis patient survival. Nevertheless, VA becomes useless after a successful renal transplant. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate the natural history of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in renal transplanted patients and the possibility of maintaining the fistula as patent or not. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate kidney transplant patients in our unit from April 1994 to April 2004. We studied 542 patients. Results There were 365 patients with a well functioning kidney. Eighty-six patients died. Ninety-one patients were put back on dialysis: 89 patients on HD and two patients on CAPD. Of the 365 patients with functioning kidney transplants, 198 patients demonstrated a patent fistula, while 167 patients had a closed fistula. One hundred and twenty-five patients had a spontaneous closure and 42 patients had a surgical closure. Of the 89 patients put back on dialysis, 49 patients used the previous AVF, while it was necessary to create a new VA in 40 patients. Conclusions As demonstrated by the results of our study, after renal transplantation the possibility of spontaneous AVF closure caused by a thrombosis is not a rare event. The dilemma is whether to preserve a fistula that could be useful in case of restarting HD or to perform a systematic fistula closure because of cardiac output and cardiac failure risks. Concerning this question there is no consensus between different authors in the literature. In reviewing the literature and analyzing our data, we conclude that the definite indications for AVF closure in well functioning renal transplanted patients are heart failure, high flow fistula, VA complications and important aesthetic reasons. Routine AVF closure is not indicated until prospective and randomized studies can demonstrate the ability of this procedure to reduce the high incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality that is present, even after renal transplantation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|