Do Medical Insurance Companies Reimburse Telemedicine Office Visits the Same as In-Person Office Visits in an Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Setting?
| Autor: | Srighana Nadella, Neeraj Panchal, Adam Bear, Tim T. Wang |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Telemedicine
medicine.medical_specialty Office Visits business.industry Office visits Significant difference Reimbursement rates Retrospective cohort study United States Medical insurance Insurance Otorhinolaryngology Family medicine Oral and maxillofacial surgery Humans Medicine Surgery Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Oral Surgery business Reimbursement Retrospective Studies |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 79:2398-2403 |
| ISSN: | 0278-2391 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.joms.2021.08.145 |
| Popis: | Purpose The use of telemedicine has grown exponentially over the last decade, but its widespread adoption has been hindered, at least in part, by uncertainty over reimbursement rate for services. The aim of this study is to compare reimbursement rates of telemedicine and in-person visits in an academic oral and maxillofacial surgery practice. Methods The investigators implemented a retrospective cohort study. The sample was composed of patients who were treated by the oral-maxillofacial surgery service at the University of Pennsylvania Health System from March 17, 2020 to February 27, 2021. The primary predictor variable was the type of patient visit, either telemedicine or in-person. Patient status, either established or new, was a covariate. The outcome variable was the mean reimbursement-to-charge (RC) ratio. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the P value was set at .05. Results This study included 6,082 submitted claims for 4,045 patients for in-person and telemedicine oral-maxillofacial surgery office visits. The mean reimbursement per insurance payor was $98.07 for a telemedicine visit (mean RC ratio = 0.48 with a standard deviation of ± 0.20) and $109.5 for an in-person visit (mean RC ratio = 0.50 with a standard deviation of ± 0.19). While there was a significant difference between the RC ratio for total telemedicine versus in-person visits (P = .001), the magnitude of the difference was only 2%. When stratifying the comparison by new (P = .73) and established patients (P = .20) for both telemedicine and in-person office visits, there was no significant difference in RC ratios. Conclusions The results suggest that there are no major discrepancies in financial reimbursement rate between telemedicine and in-person office visits. Both methods of treatment may be financially effective for oral-maxillofacial surgery providers. Future studies can compare reimbursement rates among different insurance providers and among different institutions in the United States. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|