Domestic Trials for International Crimes – A Critical Analysis of Croatian War Crimes Sentencing Jurisprudence
| Autor: | Maja Munivrana Vajda |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Croatian
Sociology and Political Science war crimes Croatia purpose of punishment aggravating and mitigating circumstances sentencing ethnicity bias International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Law Jurisprudence Political science Political Science and International Relations language War crime language.human_language |
| DOI: | 10.1163/15718123-01901002 |
| Popis: | This article will describe and critically reflect upon the sentencing practices of Croatian courts with respect to war crimes committed during the armed conflict in Croatia in the early 1990s. Over the past two and a half decades, more than 3,500 alleged war criminals have been put on trial, with some 600 finally being convicted. Yet many proceedings were initially commenced without sufficient evidence, in absentia and, arguably, with a bias towards ethnic Serbs. This article first seeks to determine whether ethnicity has played a role in prosecuting and sentencing for war crimes and then to identify to what extent sentencing goals and principles, including aggravating and mitigating factors, proclaimed by Croatian courts reflect the extraordinary nature of international crimes. An attempt is made to compare these sentences and principles with sentencing practices at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (icty). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|