On recent attempts to rebrand 'behavior analysis' as 'behavior science'
| Autor: | James E. Carr, Molli M. Luke, Erik Arntzen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
050103 clinical psychology
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Utviklingspsykologi: 265 Behavior science business.industry Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Kognitiv psykologi: 267 [VDP] 05 social sciences VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Kognitiv psykologi: 267 Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Utviklingspsykologi: 265 [VDP] Dissemination Atferdsvitenskap Verbal atferd Public relations Education Term (time) Behavior analyses Utbredelse Rebranding Political science Atferdsanalyse 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 050102 behavioral science & comparative psychology business General Psychology Verbal behavior |
| Zdroj: | European Journal of Behavior Analysis (EJOBA) |
| ISSN: | 2377-729X 1502-1149 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15021149.2019.1611130 |
| Popis: | In recent years, behavior analysts have increasingly used the term behavior science to describe the discipline behavior analysis. These “rebranding” efforts have not been concentrated in any particular domain of behavior analysis and appear to be decentralized in nature. We analyze the possible reasons for using this alternative term and describe some difficulties associated with this practice, such as the already extensive use of behavior science to describe a family of social sciences and the widespread development that has occurred under behavior analysis. We conclude the commentary by proposing several variables for behavior analysts to consider before using an alternative term to describe our discipline. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|