The use of one-piece U-shaped mesh and barbed sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
| Autor: | A. Gilabert, M.A. Costa-Martínez, A. Garcia-Segui, A. Amorós Torres, L. Lorenzo Soriano, M.F. Oltra |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Laparoscopic surgery
medicine.medical_specialty Pelvic organ Barbed sutures Sling (implant) business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy 030232 urology & nephrology General Medicine Abdominal cavity Anus Intraoperative bleeding Surgery Pelvic organ prolapse 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure medicine Vagina business |
| Zdroj: | ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica instname r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO) |
| ISSN: | 0210-4806 |
| Popis: | Introduction: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS) is considered a safe and effective surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but it requires expertise in laparoscopic surgery. The complexity of the intervention is due to the requirements of intracorporeal sutures and the manipulation of the mesh inside the cavity, which may be cumbersome. The barbed sutures (BS) simplify intracorporeal suturing and do not require knotting. Additionally, one-piece U-mesh (OP-UM) may facilitate handling, stabilization and tension adjustment. We describe our LS surgical technique using both materials to assess its feasibility, safety and effectiveness in a prospective series of patients. Materials and methods: A total of 7 patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse were included. Urogynecological history, classification of the pelvic organ prolapse according to Baden-Walker and the application of the Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire were performed in all cases. The non-absorbable polypropylene OP-UM (Uplift (TM)) was used. The posterior side of the single sting is sutured to the elevator anus muscles with two non-absorbable stitches. Two strands of BS (V-Loc (TM)), tied at their ends, were used to attach the mesh to the vagina in two lines of continuous sutures in opposite directions. Self-anchoring tackers were used for promontofixation and BS for peritoneal closure. Results: The median age was 60 years, the median time of the anterior branch mesh BS fixation was 23 minutes (range 21,30 - 26,40 min), intraoperative bleeding was minimal, and the median hospital stay was 3 days. No intraoperative complications were recorded, and no mesh erosions or recurrences were observed at a median follow-up of 14 months (range 3-25 months). All patients presented clinical improvement of the prolapse and were satisfied with surgery. We observed that the OP-UM self-stabilizes when it extends longitudinally into the abdominal cavity, reducing the need of the surgical assistant. The independent promontofixation of each part of the mesh (posterior and anterior) allows a more anatomical tension adjustment. Fixing the mesh to the vagina is fast and simple with our BS technique. Conclusions: The use of OP-UM and BS during LS is feasible, safe, effective and could simplify this surgical technique. (C) 2019 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|