Are the school version of the assessment of motor and process skills measures valid for German-speaking children?

Autor: Anne G. Fisher, Margo van Hartingsveldt, Vera Kaelin, Brigitte Gantschnig
Přispěvatelé: Kenniscentrum ACHIEVE, Faculteit Gezondheid
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Occupational therapy
Male
030506 rehabilitation
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics
Process skill
Significant group
education
371: Schulen und schulische Tätigkeiten
615.8515: Ergotherapie
German
03 medical and health sciences
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin
0302 clinical medicine
Child Development
children
schoolwork performance
Germany
occupational therapy
Activities of Daily Living
Task Performance and Analysis
medicine
618.92: Pädiatrie
Humans
Translations
Cross-cultural comparison
Child
Public Health
Environmental and Occupational Health

Reproducibility of Results
Public Health
Global Health
Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Occupational Health and Environmental Health
School health service
Schoolwork performance
Cross-cultural studies
language.human_language
Folkhälsovetenskap
global hälsa
socialmedicin och epidemiologi

Motor Skills
Austria
Child
Preschool

school health services
language
Female
Educational Measurement
0305 other medical science
Psychology
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Switzerland
Clinical psychology
Zdroj: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(2), 149-155. Taylor and Francis
ISSN: 1651-2014
1103-8128
DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1397190
Popis: BACKGROUND: There are no validated assessment tools for evaluating quality of schoolwork task performance of children living in German-speaking Europe (GSE).OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the international age-normative means of the School Version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (School AMPS) are valid for use in GSE.METHODS: The participants were 159 typically-developing children, 3-12 years, from GSE. We examined the proportions of School AMPS measures falling within ±2 standard deviation (SD) of the international age-normative means, and evaluated for significant group differences (p RESULTS: At least 95% of the GSE School AMPS measures fell within ±2 SD of the international age-normative means for the School AMPS. The only significant mean differences were for 6- (p CONCLUSIONS: Because the only identified clinically meaningful difference was associated with likely scoring error of one rater, the international age-normative means of the School AMPS appear to be valid for use with children in GSE.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje