18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma:results of a Nordic/US intergroup study
Autor: | Victor Vishwanath Iyer, Morton Coleman, Paw Jensen, Mikael Eriksson, Dorte Gillstrom, Dominick Lamonica, Myron S. Czuczman, Per Boye Hansen, Annika Loft, Marko Seppänen, Helle W. Hendel, Martin Hutchings, Karen Juul Mylam, Karin Hjorthaug, Sirpa Leppä, Peter de Nully Brown, Lars Møller Pedersen, Harald Holte, Lale Kostakoglu, Sirkku Jyrkkiö, Anne Lerberg Nielsen, Louis F. Diehl |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Male
Cancer Research medicine.medical_treatment Denmark Tomography X-Ray Computed/methods Computed tomography Multimodal Imaging 0302 clinical medicine Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Tissue Distribution Prospective Studies Finland Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test Norway Hematology Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Middle Aged Prognosis 3. Good health Survival Rate Lymphoma Large B-Cell Diffuse/drug therapy Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female Tomography Lymphoma Large B-Cell Diffuse Adult Predictive value Standardized uptake value 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult Chemoimmunotherapy Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 medicine Deauville 5-point scale Humans In patient Aged Neoplasm Staging Sweden Chemotherapy Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/pharmacokinetics business.industry medicine.disease Positron-Emission Tomography/methods United States Lymphoma Interim PET/CT Positron-Emission Tomography Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use Radiopharmaceuticals Nuclear medicine business Tomography X-Ray Computed Interim PET/CT predictive value diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Deauville 5-point scale NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA SUV-BASED ASSESSMENT EARLY F-18-FDG PET PROGNOSTIC VALUE AGGRESSIVE LYMPHOMA INTERIM-PET FDG-PET INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP RESPONSE CRITERIA RITUXIMAB 030215 immunology Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Juul Mylam, K, Kostakoglu, L, Hutchings, M, Coleman, M, Lamonica, D, Czuczman, M S, Diehl, L F, Nielsen, A L, Jensen, P, Loft, A, Hendel, H W, Iyer, V, Leppa, S, Jyrkkio, S, Holte, H, Eriksson, M, Gillstrøm, D, Hansen, P B, Seppanen, M, Hjorthaug, K, Brown, P N & Pedersen, L M 2015, ' 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : results of a Nordic/US intergroup study ', Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2005-2012 . https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.975800 Mylam, K J, Kostakoglu, L, Hutchings, M, Coleman, M, Lamonica, D, Czuczman, M S, Diehl, L F, Nielsen, A L, Jensen, P, Loft, A, Hendel, H W, Iyer, V, Leppä, S, Jyrkkiö, S, Holte, H, Eriksson, M, Gillstrøm, D, Hansen, P B, Seppänen, M, Hjorthaug, K, Brown, P D N & Pedersen, L M 2015, ' 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : results of a Nordic/US intergroup study ', Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2005-2012 . https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.975800 |
DOI: | 10.3109/10428194.2014.975800 |
Popis: | We evaluated the predictive value of interim positon emission tomography (I-PET) after one course of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). One hundred and twelve patients with DLBCL were enrolled. All patients had PET/computed tomography (CT) scans performed after one course of chemotherapy (PET-1). I-PET scans were categorized according to International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP), Deauville 5-point scale (D 5PS) with scores 1-3 considered negative (D 5PS > 3) and D 5PS with scores 1-4 considered negative (D 5PS = 5). Ratios of tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to liver SUVmax were also analyzed. We found no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between PET-negative and PET-positive patients according to IHP and D 5PS > 3. The 2-year PFS using D 5PS = 5 was 50.9% in the PET-positive group and 84.8% in the PET-negative group (p = 0.002). A tumor/liver SUVmax cut-off of 3.1 to distinguish D 5PS scores of 4 and 5 provided the best prognostic value. PET after one course of chemotherapy was not able to safely discriminate PET-positive and PET-negative patients in different prognostic groups. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |