Ethical Evaluation of Mental Health Social Research: Agreement Between Researchers and Ethics Committees
Autor: | Tonatiuh Guarneros García, Liliana Mondragón Barrios, Alberto Jiménez Tapia |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Value (ethics)
Male medicine.medical_specialty Social Psychology media_common.quotation_subject Social Sciences Violence 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Education Ethics Research 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Surveys and Questionnaires medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Ethical Review media_common Research ethics Nursing ethics business.industry Communication Research Significant difference Ethics committee 06 humanities and the arts Public relations Mental health Agreement Research Personnel Social research Behavior Addictive Suicide Mental Health Attitude Female 060301 applied ethics Psychology business Ethics Committees Research |
Zdroj: | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE. 12(3) |
ISSN: | 1556-2654 |
Popis: | The objective of this article is to compare various ethical issues considered by social scientists and research ethics committees in the evaluation of mental health social research protocols. We contacted 47 social scientists and 10 members of ethics committees in Mexico with two electronic national surveys that requested information from both groups related to the application of ethical principles in mental health social research. The results showed no significant difference between these groups in the value placed on the ethical issues explored. Based on this finding, we make proposals to strengthen the collaboration between the two groups. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |