Graduate medical education scholarly activities initiatives: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Charity J. Morgan, Lee Ann Riesenberg, William Wood, Imelda Vetter, Ana Hossein Zadeh Maleki, Jonathan McCollum, Promil Kukreja |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Biomedical Research
020205 medical informatics Best practice education Graduate medical education lcsh:Medicine Efficiency 02 engineering and technology Scholarship Education 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering 030212 general & internal medicine Productivity Curriculum Accreditation Scholarly activities lcsh:LC8-6691 Medical education lcsh:Special aspects of education Research Publications lcsh:R General Medicine Bibliometrics Education Medical Graduate Meta-analysis Psychology Publication Bias Inclusion (education) Program Evaluation Research Article |
| Zdroj: | BMC Medical Education, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-26 (2018) BMC Medical Education |
| ISSN: | 1472-6920 |
| Popis: | Background According to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residents “should participate in scholarly activity.” The development of a sustainable, successful resident scholarship program is a difficult task faced by graduate medical education leadership. Methods A medical librarian conducted a systematic literature search for English language articles published on scholarly activities initiatives in Graduate Medical Education (GME) between January 2003 and March 31 2017. Inclusion criteria included implementing a graduate medical education research curriculum or initiative designed to enhance intern, resident, or fellow scholarly activities using a control or comparison group. We defined major outcomes as increases in publications or presentations. Random effects meta-analysis was used to compare the rate of publications before and after implementation of curriculum or initiative. Results We identified 32 relevant articles. Twenty-nine (91%) reported on resident publications, with 35% (10/29) reporting statistically significant increases. Fifteen articles (47%) reported on regional, national, or international presentations, with only 13% (2/15) reporting a statistically significant increase in productivity. Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis; for these studies, the post-initiative publication rate was estimated to be 2.6 times the pre-intervention rate (95% CI: 1.6 to 4.3; p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink