Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights

Autor: Jaime Jiménez-Pernett, Bryn Williams-Jones, Pascale Lehoux, Fiona A. Miller
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Adult
Male
Online forum
Biomedical Technology
Video Recording
Qualitative property
computer.software_genre
Health informatics
Health administration
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Inventions
Surveys and Questionnaires
Intervention (counseling)
Humans
Learning
Medicine
Prospective Studies
030212 general & internal medicine
Evaluation
Problem Solving
Response rate (survey)
Multimedia
business.industry
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
030503 health policy & services
Health Policy
Nursing research
Quebec
Health technology
lcsh:RA1-1270
Public involvement
Research Design
Public Opinion
Survey data collection
Female
Perception
Comprehension
Knowledge transfer and exchange
Health innovation
0305 other medical science
business
Video-based deliberations
computer
Prospective analyses
Research Article
Zdroj: BMC Health Services Research, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2016)
BMC Health Services Research
ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1870-z
Popis: Background Using a combination of videos and online short stories, we conducted four face-to-face deliberative workshops in Montreal (Quebec, Canada) with members of the public who later joined additional participants in an online forum to discuss the social and ethical implications of prospective technologies. This paper presents the participants’ appraisal of our intervention and provides novel qualitative insights into the use of videos and online tools in public deliberations. Methods We applied a mixed-method study design. A self-administered survey contained open- and close-ended items using a 5-level Likert-like scale. Absolute frequencies and proportions for the close-ended items were compiled. Qualitative data included field notes, the transcripts of the workshops and the participants’ contributions to the online forum. The qualitative data were used to flesh out the survey data describing the participants’ appraisal of: 1) the multimedia components of our intervention; 2) its deliberative face-to-face and online processes; and 3) its perceived effects. Results Thirty-eight participants contributed to the workshops and 57 to the online forum. A total of 46 participants filled-in the survey, for a response rate of 73 % (46/63). The videos helped 96 % of the participants to understand the fictional technologies and the online scenarios helped 98 % to reflect about the issues raised. Up to 81 % considered the arguments of the other participants to be well thought-out. Nearly all participants felt comfortable sharing their ideas in both the face-to-face (89 %) and online environments (93 %), but 88 % preferred the face-to-face workshop. As a result of the intervention, 85 % reflected more about the pros and cons of technology and 94 % learned more about the way technologies may transform society. Conclusions This study confirms the methodological feasibility of a deliberative intervention whose originality lies in its use of videos and online scenarios. To increase deliberative depth and foster a strong engagement by all participants, face-to-face and online components need to be well integrated. Our findings suggest that online tools should be designed by considering, one the one hand, the participants’ self-perceived ability to share written comments and, on the other hand, the ease with which other participants can respond to such contributions.
Databáze: OpenAIRE