Comparison of two different measurement methods to determine glenoid bone defects: area or width?
| Autor: | Murat Tonbul, Mehmet Ugur Ozbaydar, Levent Yalçın, Egemen Altan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty Shoulders symbols.namesake Imaging Three-Dimensional Recurrence Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Bone Resorption Low correlation Aged Retrospective Studies Measurement method medicine.diagnostic_test Shoulder Joint business.industry Shoulder Dislocation Arthroscopy Organ Size General Medicine Anterior shoulder Middle Aged Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Surgery Scapula Orthopedic surgery symbols Female Level iii Tomography X-Ray Computed business Nuclear medicine |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 23:1215-1222 |
| ISSN: | 1058-2746 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.029 |
| Popis: | Background: This study compared two different techniques that have been used to measure the glenoids of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: We analyzed 36 patients who had received arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. Retrospectively, 3-dimensional computed tomography images of both shoulders were available for these patients. Two measurement methods were compared to determine the glenoid defects. One of these techniques is based on linear measurement, previously defined as the glenoid index. The other method is based on surface area measurement. Subsequently, 3 more diameters and the average values obtained from these diameters were compared with the surface measurement method. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was assessed to determine the relationship. Results: There was an almost perfect relationship between measurement methods when the defect area was less than 6% of the inferior glenoid circle (r, 0.915; P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect