Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the ‘Big TMS Data Collaboration’
Autor: | Steven J. Bowe, Charlotte B. Davies, Giacomo Koch, Peter G. Enticott, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Nigel C. Rogasch, Ali Jannati, Sung Wook Chung, George J. Youssef, Daniel T. Corp, Julie Stamm, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Peter J. Fried, Joyce Gomes-Osman, Gillian M. Clark, Hannah G.K. Bereznicki |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Data Analysis
Male CTBS Individuality Audiology 0302 clinical medicine Time of day Transcranial and magnetic stimulation Theta Rhythm Intersectoral Collaboration Aged 80 and over Neuronal Plasticity General Neuroscience 05 social sciences Motor Cortex Middle Aged 16. Peace & justice Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Response Variability Healthy Volunteers Regression Big data Theta-burst stimulation Transcranial and magnetic stimulation Variability Female Psychology Adult medicine.medical_specialty Data collaboration Adolescent Biophysics Article 050105 experimental psychology NO Transcranial and magnetic stimulation lcsh:RC321-571 Scale analysis (statistics) Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Big data medicine Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Variability lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Aged Theta-burst stimulation Small sample Evoked Potentials Motor Theta burst Neurology (clinical) 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Brain Stimulation, Vol 13, Iss 5, Pp 1476-1488 (2020) Brain Stimul |
Popis: | Background Many studies have attempted to identify the sources of interindividual variability in response to theta-burst stimulation (TBS). However, these studies have been limited by small sample sizes, leading to conflicting results. Objective/Hypothesis This study brought together over 60 TMS researchers to form the ‘Big TMS Data Collaboration’, and create the largest known sample of individual participant TBS data to date. The goal was to enable a more comprehensive evaluation of factors driving TBS response variability. Methods 118 corresponding authors of TMS studies were emailed and asked to provide deidentified individual TMS data. Mixed-effects regression investigated a range of individual and study level variables for their contribution to iTBS and cTBS response variability. Results 430 healthy participants’ TBS data was pooled across 22 studies (mean age = 41.9; range = 17–82; females = 217). Baseline MEP amplitude, age, target muscle, and time of day significantly predicted iTBS-induced plasticity. Baseline MEP amplitude and timepoint after TBS significantly predicted cTBS-induced plasticity. Conclusions This is the largest known study of interindividual variability in TBS. Our findings indicate that a significant portion of variability can be attributed to the methods used to measure the modulatory effects of TBS. We provide specific methodological recommendations in order to control and mitigate these sources of variability. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |