Drug-drug interactions in patients treated for cancer
Autor: | T. van Gelder, P.M.L.A. van den Bemt, F. de Man, Agnes Jager, J. D. Brugma, F. Piran, I. Vincenten, A. W. Rijneveld, Frank G A Jansman, Ron H.J. Mathijssen, van Robert Leeuwen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Real World Studies in PharmacoEpidemiology, -Genetics, -Economics and -Therapy (PEGET), Pharmacy, Medical Oncology, Hematology |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Male
drug-drug interactions Psychological intervention Administration Oral Comorbidity Pharmacology law.invention Risk Factors law Neoplasms Ambulatory Care Odds Ratio Drug Interactions Prospective Studies Prospective cohort study Netherlands Aged 80 and over Clinical pharmacology Hematology Middle Aged PREVALENCE Oncology Administration Intravenous Female Pharmacy Service Hospital pharmacokinetics Adult medicine.medical_specialty Medication Therapy Management Antineoplastic Agents Nonprescription Drugs Risk Assessment EVENTS Young Adult SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being Intervention (counseling) medicine pharmacodynamics Humans cancer medication review Intensive care medicine Aged business.industry Retrospective cohort study Drug interaction medicine.disease Clinical trial Logistic Models Multivariate Analysis Polypharmacy pharmacology business Software |
Zdroj: | Annals of Oncology, 26(5), 992-997. Oxford University Press Annals of Oncology, 26(5), 992-997. Elsevier Ltd. |
ISSN: | 0923-7534 |
Popis: | Drug interactions are of major concern, since cancer patients take many medications and may have serious consequences. Therefore, a study was designed to identify interactions leading to interventions. It was revealed that the consultancy of the clinical pharmacologist led to a doubling in interventions. To improve the safe use of drugs in oncology, an assessment of prescribed drugs is needed. Background Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are of major concern in oncology, since cancer patients typically take many concomitant medications. Retrospective studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence of DDIs. However, prospective studies on DDIs needing interventions in cancer patients have not yet been carried out. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to identify DDIs leading to interventions among ambulatory cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment. Patients and methods Patients starting with a new treatment regimen with i.v. or oral anticancer medication were asked to participate. The patients' medication was checked for DDIs by using drug interaction software. An expert team of clinical pharmacologists evaluated the relevance of these identified DDIs. If a DDI was qualified as potentially clinically relevant, an intervention was proposed to the treating (hemato)oncologist. Several variables were studied as determinants for performing an intervention. Descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. Results In this study, 302 patients were included. A total of 603 DDIs were identified by the drug interaction software and judged by the expert team. Of all 603 DDIs, 120 DDIs were considered potentially clinically relevant. These 120 DDIs, present in a total of 81 patients, resulted in a clinical intervention already executed by the (hemato)oncologist in 39 patients (13%), while an additional intervention was proposed by a clinical pharmacologist in 42 patients (14%). The number of comorbidities and the number of ‘over-the-counter' drugs were identified as determinants. Conclusions Clinical interventions on DDIs are frequently required among patients starting with anticancer therapy. Structured screening for these potentially clinically relevant DDIs, by (hemato)oncologists in close collaborations with clinical pharmacologists, should take place before the start and during anticancer treatment. Clinical Trials number This study was registered at the Dutch Trial Registry under number NTR3760. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |