Erratum to: Appearances of screen-detected versus symptomatic colorectal cancers at CT colonography
Autor: | Stuart A. Taylor, Wendy Atkin, Andrew Plumb, Claire Nickerson, Steve Halligan, David Burling, Katherine Wooldrage, Fiona Pathiraja |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Cancer Research UK |
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Male
Gastrointestinal medicine.medical_specialty Computer-assisted diagnosis Sensitivity and Specificity Colorectal neoplasms CT colonography Occult blood medicine Humans Multicenter Studies as Topic Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Prospective Studies Early Detection of Cancer Aged Neoplasm Staging Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Retrospective Studies Neuroradiology Observer Variation Science & Technology medicine.diagnostic_test Screen detected Rectal Neoplasms business.industry Radiology Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Ultrasound 1103 Clinical Sciences Interventional radiology Mass screening General Medicine Middle Aged digestive system diseases Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Colonic Neoplasms Female Radiology Erratum business Life Sciences & Biomedicine Colonography Computed Tomographic |
Zdroj: | European Radiology |
ISSN: | 1432-1084 0938-7994 |
Popis: | Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the morphology, radiological stage, conspicuity, and computer-assisted detection (CAD) characteristics of colorectal cancers (CRC) detected by computed tomographic colonography (CTC) in screening and symptomatic populations. Methods Two radiologists independently analyzed CTC images from 133 patients diagnosed with CRC in (a) two randomized trials of symptomatic patients (35 patients with 36 tumours) and (b) a screening program using fecal occult blood testing (FOBt; 98 patients with 100 tumours), measuring tumour length, volume, morphology, radiological stage, and subjective conspicuity. A commercial CAD package was applied to both datasets. We compared CTC characteristics between screening and symptomatic populations with multivariable regression. Results Screen-detected CRC were significantly smaller (mean 3.0 vs 4.3 cm, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |