Erratum to: Appearances of screen-detected versus symptomatic colorectal cancers at CT colonography

Autor: Stuart A. Taylor, Wendy Atkin, Andrew Plumb, Claire Nickerson, Steve Halligan, David Burling, Katherine Wooldrage, Fiona Pathiraja
Přispěvatelé: Cancer Research UK
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Male
Gastrointestinal
medicine.medical_specialty
Computer-assisted diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Colorectal neoplasms
CT colonography
Occult blood
medicine
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Prospective Studies
Early Detection of Cancer
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Neuroradiology
Observer Variation
Science & Technology
medicine.diagnostic_test
Screen detected
Rectal Neoplasms
business.industry
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Ultrasound
1103 Clinical Sciences
Interventional radiology
Mass screening
General Medicine
Middle Aged
digestive system diseases
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Colonic Neoplasms
Female
Radiology
Erratum
business
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Colonography
Computed Tomographic
Zdroj: European Radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
0938-7994
Popis: Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the morphology, radiological stage, conspicuity, and computer-assisted detection (CAD) characteristics of colorectal cancers (CRC) detected by computed tomographic colonography (CTC) in screening and symptomatic populations. Methods Two radiologists independently analyzed CTC images from 133 patients diagnosed with CRC in (a) two randomized trials of symptomatic patients (35 patients with 36 tumours) and (b) a screening program using fecal occult blood testing (FOBt; 98 patients with 100 tumours), measuring tumour length, volume, morphology, radiological stage, and subjective conspicuity. A commercial CAD package was applied to both datasets. We compared CTC characteristics between screening and symptomatic populations with multivariable regression. Results Screen-detected CRC were significantly smaller (mean 3.0 vs 4.3 cm, p
Databáze: OpenAIRE