Silencing trust: confidence and familiarity in re-engineering knowledge infrastructures
Autor: | Gaymon Bennett, Rune Nydal, Martin Kuiper, Astrid Lægreid |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Health (social science)
Knowledge management Databases Factual Exploit media_common.quotation_subject Medical law Trust 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Biological Science Disciplines Education 03 medical and health sciences Humans Quality (business) Sociology Re engineering 030304 developmental biology media_common 0303 health sciences Computational model Knowledge bases business.industry Research Health Policy Moral habitus Knowledge infrastructures 06 humanities and the arts Scientific Contribution Familiarity Microarray Analysis Philosophy of biology Knowledge Workflow Philosophy of medicine Domesticating futures 060301 applied ethics Systems biology business |
Zdroj: | Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy |
ISSN: | 1572-8633 1386-7423 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11019-020-09957-0 |
Popis: | In this paper, we tell the story of efforts currently underway, on diverse fronts, to build digital knowledge repositories (‘knowledge-bases’) to support research in the life sciences. If successful, knowledge bases will be part of a new knowledge infrastructure—capable of facilitating ever-more comprehensive, computational models of biological systems. Such an infrastructure would, however, represent a sea-change in the technological management and manipulation of complex data, inducing a generational shift in how questions are asked and answered and results published and circulated. Integrating such knowledge bases into the daily workflow of the lab thus destabilizes a number of well-established habits which biologists rely on to ensure the quality of the knowledge they produce, evaluate, communicate and exploit. As the story we tell here shows, such destabilization introduces a situation of unfamiliarity, one that carries with it epistemic risks. It should elicit—to use Niklas Luhmann’s terms—the question of trust: a shared recognition that the reliability of research practices is being risked, but that such a risk is worth taking in view of what may be gained. And yet, the problem of trust is being unexpectedly silenced. How that silencing has come about, why it matters, and what might yet be done forms the heart of this paper. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |