Prospective assessment of mask versus frame fixation during Gamma Knife treatment for brain metastases

Autor: Mario Grimm, Sabine K. Mai, Arne Mathias Ruder, Martin Polednik, Florian Stieler, Frank A. Giordano, Grit Welzel, Frederik Wenz, Ulrich Köppen
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Radiotherapy and Oncology. 147:195-199
ISSN: 0167-8140
Popis: Purpose The newest generation of the Leksell Gamma Knife (GK) allows frame based as well as frameless treatment. We here report outcomes of a prospective non-randomized study on mask fixation (MF) versus frame fixation (FF) for GK treatment of brain metastases. Methods The decision for FF or MF was made on a case-by-case basis. Factors considered were patients’ preference, proximity of critical structures, V12 and treatment time. Either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in up to 3 fractions was performed. For MF, a PTV margin of 1 mm was added. Follow-up included quarterly MRI scans. The primary outcome was local control. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of radionecrosis. Results A total of 197 lesions (169 FF and 28 MF) were treated in 76 patients (59 FF and 17 MF). 187 lesions were treated with SRS and 10 with FSRT. Median dose was 22 Gy in both groups and median follow-up was 9.3 months. There was a higher local failure rate (HR: 3.69; 95%CI: 1.13–12.0; p = 0.03) with 11 local failures in the FF and none in the MF cohort. No differences were observed between the groups for OS (median: n.r. vs. 16.9 months; HR:1.00; 95%CI: 0.41–2.46; p = 0.999) and PFS (median: 6.9 vs. 8.4 months; HR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.47–1.79; p = 0.800). Three cases of radionecrosis occurred with FF but none with MF (p = 0.67). Conclusions Gamma Knife treatment with MF does not result in worse outcome or increased rates of radionecrosis in this non-randomized study.
Databáze: OpenAIRE