Comparison between the four-field box and field-in-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the esophagus using dose–volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities
Autor: | Farzaneh Allaveisi, Amir Nami Moghadam |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Organs at Risk medicine.medical_specialty Esophageal Neoplasms medicine.medical_treatment Normal tissue 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Carcinoma Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Esophagus Radiometry Probability Lung business.industry Radiotherapy Planning Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy Dosage Esophageal cancer medicine.disease Spinal cord Surgery Radiation therapy medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Radiotherapy Conformal business Nuclear medicine Complication |
Zdroj: | Japanese Journal of Radiology. 35:327-334 |
ISSN: | 1867-108X 1867-1071 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11604-017-0637-8 |
Popis: | We evaluated and compared the performance of the field-in-field (FIF) to that of the four-field box (4FB) technique regarding dosimetric and radiobiological parameters for radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were selected. For each patient, two treatment plans were created: 4FB and FIF. The parameters compared included the conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D mean, D max, tumor control probability (TCP), V 20Gy and V 30Gy of the heart and lungs, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and monitor units per fraction (MU/fr). A paired t-test analysis did not show any significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two techniques in terms of the CI and TCP. However, the HI significantly improved when the FIF was applied. D max of the PTV, lung, and spinal cord were also significantly better with the FIF. Moreover, the lung V 20Gy as well as the NTCPs of the lung and spinal cord significantly reduced when the FIF was used, and the MU/fr was significantly decreased. The FIF showed evident advantages over 4FB: a more homogeneous dose distribution, lower D max values, and fewer required MUs, while it also retained PTV dose conformality. FIF should be considered as a simple technique to use clinically in cases with esophageal malignancies, especially in clinics with no IMRT. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |