Practical considerations for spirometry during the COVID-19 outbreak: Literature review and insights
Autor: | Santi Nolasco, Raffaele Campisi, Antonio Spanevello, Nunzio Crimi, Pietro Impellizzeri, Claudia Crimi |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
SEAIC
Sociedad Espanola de Alergologia e Inmunologia Clinica Outpatient clinic SEPAR Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica AET Asociacion de Especialistas en Enfermeria del trabajo ATS American Thoracic Society Ambulatory Care Facilities Disease Outbreaks Infectious Disease Transmission Professional-to-Patient Scientific evidence guidelines ACH air changes per hour ARTP Association for Respiratory Technology and Physiology Manufacturing Industry Pandemic SPP Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019 medicine.diagnostic_test TSANZ Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand BTS British Thoracic Society Pulmonary function test Equipment Design Limiting ERS European Respiratory Society Respiratory Function Tests AEC Asociacion de Enfermeria Comunitaria Professional association ANZSRS Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science Ltd SPLF Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française Safety Equipment and Supplies Utilization PPE personal protective equipment Spirometry Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine medicine.medical_specialty ITS/AIPO Italian Thoracic Society/Associazione Italiana Pneumologi Ospedalieri COVID-19 Guidelines SARS-CoV-2 Consensus Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) SUNEUMO Sociedad Uruguaya de Neumologia Clinical Decision-Making Guidelines as Topic COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease PFTs pulmonary function tests Article WHO World Health Organization Diseases of the respiratory system ITS Irish Thoracic Society Physicians HCWs health care workers medicine Humans Pandemics RC705-779 business.industry Task force CLEVELAND Respiratory Institute Cleveland Clinic UV ultraviolet Family medicine business IRS/SIP Italian Respiratory Society/Società Italiana di Pneumologia |
Zdroj: | Pulmonology, Vol 27, Iss 5, Pp 438-447 (2021) Pulmonology |
Popis: | Background As the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide, countries are dealing with different phases of the pandemic. Lately, scientific evidence has been growing about the measures for reopening respiratory outpatient services during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to summarize the key differences and similarities among recommendations by different national and international organizations. Methods We searched on Google and Pubmed for recently published National and International Recommendations/Guidelines/Position Papers from professional organizations and societies, offering a guidance to physicians on how to safely perform pulmonary function testing during COVID-19 pandemic. We also searched for spirometry manufacturers' operational indications. Results Indications on spirometry were released by the Chinese Task force, the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Societe de Pneumologie de Langue Francaise, the Spanish Societies (Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica, Sociedad Espanola de Alergologia e Inmunologia Clinica, Asociacion de Especialistas en Enfermeria del trabajo, Asociacion de Enfermeria Comunitaria), the Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia, the British Thoracic Society/Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology, the Irish Thoracic Society, the Sociedad Uruguaya de Neumologia, the Italian Thoracic Society and the Italian Respiratory Society, Cleveland Clinic and Nebraska Medical Center. Detailed technical recommendations were found on manufacturers’ websites. We found several similarities across available guidelines for safely resuming pulmonary function services, as well as differences in criteria for selecting eligible patients for which spirometry is deemed essential and advice which was not homogenous on room ventilation precautions. Conclusions This study shows a synthesis of national/international guidelines allowing practicing physicians to adapt and shape the way to organize their outpatient services locally. There is generally good agreement on the importance of limiting pulmonary function testing to selected cases only. However, significant differences concerning the subsets of candidate patients, as well as on the management of adequate room ventilation, were observed. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |