Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
| Autor: | Ricky M Trigg, S. Parpart-Li, L.J. Martinson, Jacqui Shaw |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Trigg, Ricky [0000-0001-9329-9344], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Protocol (science) medicine.medical_specialty Multidisciplinary Standardization business.industry Disease progression MEDLINE Early detection Article 03 medical and health sciences 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine Circulating free DNA Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Medicine lcsh:H1-99 Liquid biopsy lcsh:Social sciences (General) business Blood specimen Intensive care medicine lcsh:Science (General) lcsh:Q1-390 |
| Zdroj: | Heliyon, Vol 4, Iss 7, Pp e00699-(2018) Heliyon |
| DOI: | 10.17863/cam.27948 |
| Popis: | Background Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is under investigation as a liquid biopsy of cancer for early detection, monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response. This systematic review of the primary cfDNA literature aims to identify and evaluate factors that influence recovery of cfDNA, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for standardization of methods. Methods A search of the Ovid and Cochrane databases was undertaken in May 2018 to obtain relevant literature on cfDNA isolation and quantification. Retrieved titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors. The factors evaluated include choice of specimen type (plasma or serum); time-to-processing of whole blood; blood specimen tube; centrifugation protocol (speed, time, temperature and number of spins); and methods of cfDNA isolation and quantification. Findings Of 4,172 articles identified through the database search, 52 proceeded to full-text review and 37 met the criteria for inclusion. A quantitative analysis was not possible, due to significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches between studies. Therefore, included data was tabulated and a textual qualitative synthesis approach was taken. Interpretation This is the first systematic review of methodological factors that influence recovery and quantification of cfDNA, enabling recommendations to be made that will support standardization of methodological approaches towards development of blood-based cancer tests. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|