Manipulability of Stable Mechanisms

Autor: Michael Egesdal, Marek Pycia, M. Bumin Yenmez, Peter F. Chen
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Zdroj: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. 8:202-214
ISSN: 1945-7685
1945-7669
DOI: 10.1257/mic.20150035
Popis: We study the manipulability of stable matching mechanisms and show that manipulability comparisons are equivalent to preference comparisons: for any agent, a mechanism is more manipulable than another if and only if this agent prefers the latter to the former. One important implication is that when agents on one side of the market have unit demand, no stable matching mechanism is less manipulable than another for all agents. (JEL C78, D82)
Databáze: OpenAIRE