Figures S1 -S3 and Table S1 from Dual function of epaxial musculature for swimming and suction feeding in largemouth bass

Autor: Yordano E. Jimenez, Brainerd, Elizabeth L.
Rok vydání: 2020
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11493582
Popis: Figure S1. Effects of prey type on peak pressure. Data are pooled from all three bass. Mean ± s.e.m. peak pressures for successful strikes were 1.79 ± 0.09 kPa for pellets (N = 31) and 5.32 ± 0.81 kPa for goldfish (N = 25).; Figure S2. Sampling distributions for each individual. Locomotion and feeding data were collected from all marked sites, except for those marked with an ‘f’.; Figure S3. Effects of muscle activation at 0.50 BL on suction feeding performance. Weighted activation intensity was calculated by normalizing each midbody electrode to the max voltage measured for feeding, weighing the normalized intensity from each dorsoventral region by its percentage of epaxial cross-sectional area and adding all the weighted values. Successful and unsuccessful strike attempts are both included in this analysis. Black circle, bass01; red triangle, bass02; blue square, bass04. Regression equations, R2 values, and p-values in Table S1; Table S1. Summary of linear regression analyses for figures 4 and S3. In all cases, there is a positive and significant relationship between performance and weighted activation intensity. As noted in the methods, we did not analyze midbody data for sprinting behaviors due to incomplete sampling in that region.
Databáze: OpenAIRE