Developing and Implementing a Standardized Ictal Examination in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
| Autor: | Sahily Reyes-Esteves, Jackie Raab, Chloe E. Hill, Kathryn A. Davis, Ammar Kheder, Catherine V. Kulick-Soper, Lisa Faillace, Susanna S. O'Kula |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Research medicine.disease nervous system diseases Staff satisfaction 03 medical and health sciences Seizure onset Epilepsy Patient safety 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation nervous system Medicine Epilepsy monitoring Ictal Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Confusion |
| Zdroj: | Neurol Clin Pract |
| ISSN: | 2163-0402 |
| Popis: | BackgroundThe ictal examination is crucial for neuroanatomic localization of seizure onset, which informs medical and neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy. Substantial variation exists in ictal examination performance in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). We developed and implemented a standardized examination to facilitate rapid, reliable execution of all testing domains and adherence to patient safety maneuvers.MethodsFollowing observation of examination performance, root cause analysis of barriers, and review of consensus guidelines, an ictal examination was developed and disseminated. In accordance with quality improvement methodology, revisions were enacted following the initial intervention, including differentiation between pathways for convulsive and nonconvulsive seizures. We evaluated ictal examination fidelity, efficiency, and EMU staff satisfaction before and after the intervention.ResultsWe identified barriers to ictal examination performance as confusion regarding ictal examination protocol, inadequate education of the rationale for the examination and its components, and lack of awareness of patient-specific goals. Over an 18-month period, 100 ictal examinations were reviewed, 50 convulsive and 50 nonconvulsive. Ictal examination performance varied during the study period without sustained improvement for convulsive or nonconvulsive seizure examination. The new examination was faster to perform (0.8 vs 1.5 minutes). Postintervention, EMU staff expressed satisfaction with the examination, but many still did not understand why certain components were performed.ConclusionWe identified key barriers to EMU ictal assessment and completed real-world testing of a standardized, streamlined ictal examination. We found it challenging to reliably change ictal examination performance in our EMU; further study of implementation is warranted. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|