A comparison of acute toxicity endpoints for adult honey bees with technical grade active ingredients and typical end-use products as test substance
Autor: | Ana R Cabrera, Silvia Hinarejos, Susan E Spruill, Bridget F. O'Neill |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
AcademicSubjects/SCI01382
Short Communications Biology Risk Assessment Median lethal dose Toxicology median lethal dose Toxicity Tests Acute Animals contact toxicity Pesticides pesticide Active ingredient Ecology Apidae General Medicine Honey bee Bees Pesticide biology.organism_classification Hymenoptera Acute toxicity oral toxicity Insect Science Toxicity Apis mellifera Risk assessment |
Zdroj: | Journal of Economic Entomology |
DOI: | 10.13140/rg.2.2.35503.48800 |
Popis: | The honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), is a model organism for pollinators in risk assessment frameworks globally. The acute toxicity tests with adult honey bees for contact and oral exposure are part of the requirements for pesticide registration and are typically conducted with the active ingredient. A question often asked is if the typical end-use product (TEP) is more toxic than the technical grade active ingredient (TGAI) to honey bees. We explored this question by mining publicly available databases from regulatory agencies worldwide, where testing with the TEP is required. The objective of this study was to determine whether TEPs are comparable in toxicity to the TGAI. The dataset was analyzed via a 3 × 3 contingency table with toxicity categories, as the data cannot be computed for regression analysis. Of the 151 active ingredients with reported endpoints for contact exposure, 28 were classified as either moderately or highly toxic, 123 were classified as practically nontoxic, and 3 were inconclusive. Only two (1.3%) were reclassified from nontoxic to moderately toxic as the TEP. Of the 141 active ingredients with reported endpoints for oral exposure, 23 were classified as moderately or highly toxic, 113 were classified as practically nontoxic, and 5 were inconclusive. Only five (3.6%) were reclassified from nontoxic to moderately toxic as the TEP. Fewer than 5% of the total TEPs evaluated (contact and oral) were shown to be more toxic than the TGAI, suggesting that the risk assessments of TGAIs would be sufficiently protective to pollinators at the screening laboratory level. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |