Freud and Albert Moll: how kindred spirits became bitter foes
| Autor: | Harry Oosterhuis |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | History, RS: FASoS MUSTS, RS: FASoS Huizinga Instituut |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Psychoanalysis
Sexology Interprofessional Relations Albert Moll sexology Tribute Human sexuality Sigmund Freud 060104 history German Course of action Germany Humans 0601 history and archaeology Parallels Philosophy sexual theory History 19th Century psychoanalysis 06 humanities and the arts History 20th Century Dissent and Disputes language.human_language Albert Moll plagiarism priority claims psychoanalysis sexology sexual theory Sigmund Freud Psychiatry and Mental health 060105 history of science technology & medicine Austria language Suspect plagiarism priority claims |
| Zdroj: | History of Psychiatry, 31(3):ARTN 0957154X20922130, 294-310. SAGE Publications Inc. |
| ISSN: | 1740-2360 0957-154X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0957154x20922130 |
| Popis: | This article explores the antagonism between Sigmund Freud and the German neurologist and sexologist Albert Moll. When Moll, in 1908, published a book about the sexuality of children, Freud, without any grounds, accused him of plagiarism. In fact, Moll had reason to suspect Freud of plagiarism since there are many parallels between Freud’s Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie and Moll’s Untersuchungen über die Libido sexualis. Freud had read this book carefully, but hardly paid tribute to Moll’s innovative thinking about sexuality. A comparison between the two works casts doubt on Freud’s claim that his work was a revolutionary breakthrough. Freud’s course of action raises questions about his integrity. The article also critically addresses earlier evaluations of the clash. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|