Open suprapubic versus retropubic prostatectomy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during resident's learning curve: a randomized controlled trial

Autor: Gabriel Kushiyama Teixeira, Pedro Hermínio Forseto, Paulo Kouiti Sakuramoto, Andre Kataguiri, Fernanda Batistini Yamada, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Marcos Tobias-Machado, Leonardo Monte Marques Lins, Arie Carneiro, Carlos Ricardo Doi Bautzer, Alexandre Den Julio, Marcelo Langer Wroclawski
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Zdroj: International braz j urol v.42 n.2 2016
International Braz J Urol
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 42, Iss 2, Pp 284-292 (2016)
International braz j urol, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 284-292, Published: APR 2016
International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Popis: Purpose: This study compared the suprapubic (SP) versus retropubic (RP) prostatectomy for the treatment of large prostates and evaluated perioperative surgical morbidity and improvement of urinary symptoms. Materials and Methods: In this single centre, prospective, randomised study, 65 consecutive patients with LUTS and surgical indication with prostate volume greater than 75g underwent open prostatectomy to compare the RP (32 patients) versus SP (33 patients) technique. Results: The SP group exhibited a higher incidence of complications (p=0.002). Regarding voiding pattern analysis (IPSS and flowmetry), both were significantly effective compared to pre-treatment baseline. The RP group parameters were significantly better, with higher peak urinary flow (SP: 16.77 versus RP: 23.03mL/s, p=0.008) and a trend of lower IPSS score (SP: 6.67 versus RP 4.14, p=0.06). In a subgroup evaluation of patients with prostate volumes larger than 100g, blood loss was lower in those undergoing SP prostatectomy (p=0.003). Patients with prostates smaller than 100g in the SP group exhibited a higher incidence of low grade late complications (p=0.004). Conclusions: The SP technique was related to a higher incidence of minor complications in the late postoperative period. High volume prostates were associated with increased bleeding when the RP technique was utilized. The RP prostatectomy was associated with higher peak urinary flow and a trend of a lower IPSS Score.
Databáze: OpenAIRE