Regimen‐intensity per count‐recovery and hospitalization index: A new tool to assign regimen intensity for AML
Autor: | Ylinne Lynch, Elihu H. Estey, Jennifer E. Nyland, Pamela S. Becker, Megan Othus, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Mary Elizabeth Percival, Shirali Agarwal, Mohamed L. Sorror |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Blood Platelets
0301 basic medicine Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Neutrophils acute myeloid leukemia Logistic regression lcsh:RC254-282 Risk Assessment Model validation law.invention Leukocyte Count 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Older patients Randomized controlled trial Predictive Value of Tests Risk Factors law Clinical Decision Rules Internal medicine Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols medicine Humans survey Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Original Research Platelet Count business.industry Medical record induction therapy Clinical Cancer Research lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Intensive care unit expert opinion Intensity (physics) Hospitalization Leukemia Myeloid Acute Regimen Treatment Outcome 030104 developmental biology Oncology Health Care Surveys 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis intensity business |
Zdroj: | Cancer Medicine Cancer Medicine, Vol 9, Iss 18, Pp 6515-6523 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2045-7634 |
Popis: | Background Low‐intensity regimens have been increasingly used to treat older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent studies, however, suggest older patients can tolerate and potentially benefit from intensive chemotherapeutic regimens. The ability to compare the utility of varying regimen intensities in AML is hindered by the lack of a standardized definition of “regimen intensity.” Methods We conducted a survey asking AML physicians which of 38 regimens they would consider intensive vs less‐intensive. Electronic medical records of 592 patients receiving many of these regimens were used to design a model characterizing regimens as intensive vs less‐intensive as identified by ≥75% physician consensus. Variables included frequency and length of hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, severe gastrointestinal toxicities, time to nadir, and recovery of neutrophil/platelet count. Results Physicians agreed at a rate of 75%‐100% on the assignment of degree of intensity to the majority (n = 28) of these regimens, while the level of agreement was Surveyed physicians reached ≥75% concordance on ratings of intensity for 28/38 regimens (74%) used in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. We developed and validated the “Regimen‐Intensity per Count‐recovery and Hospitalization” (RICH) index, incorporating number and length of hospitalizations and count recovery, to characterize whether a regimen should be considered more‐ or less‐intensive. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |