Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia
Autor: | Mehdi Zandian, Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi, Masomeh Mohebbi |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Visual acuity
genetic structures PresbyLASIK medicine.medical_treatment Review Article law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine lcsh:Ophthalmology law Refractive surgery medicine Reduction (orthopedic surgery) business.industry Corneal Inlays Multifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) Presbyopia Surgical correction medicine.disease Corneal inlay eye diseases Lens (optics) Ophthalmology Intraocular lenses lcsh:RE1-994 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Optometry sense organs medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 413-418 (2017) |
ISSN: | 2008-322X 2008-2010 |
Popis: | Presbyopia is the primary cause of reduction in the quality of life of people in their 40s, due to dependence on spectacles. Therefore, presbyopia correction has become an evolving and rapidly progressive field in refractive surgery. There are two primary options for presbyopia correction: the dynamic approach uses the residual accommodative capacity of the eye, and the static approach attempts to enhance the depth of focus of the optical system. The dynamic approach attempts to reverse suspected pathophysiologic changes. Dynamic approaches such as accommodative intraocular lenses (IOLs), scleral expansion techniques, refilling, and photodisruption of the crystalline lens have attracted less clinical interest due to inconsistent results and the complexity of the techniques. We have reviewed the most popular static techniques in presbyopia surgery, including multifocal IOLs, PresbyLASIK, and corneal inlays, but we should emphasize that these techniques are very different from the physiologic status of an untouched eye. A systematic PubMed search for the keywords "presbylasik", "multifocal IOL", and "presbyopic corneal inlay" revealed 634 articles; 124 were controlled clinical trials, 95 were published in the previous 10 years, and 78 were English with available full text. We reviewed the abstracts and rejected the unrelated articles; other references were included as needed. This narrative review compares different treatments according to available information on the optical basis of each treatment modality, including the clinical outcomes such as near, intermediate, and far visual acuity, spectacles independence, quality of vision, and dysphotopic phenomena. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |