| Popis: |
The Budyko-based elasticity method has been widely employed to clarify the driving factors behind runoff changes. However, different formulations of the Budyko framework could produce biases in the elasticity analysis and the assessment errors induced from different formulations of the Budyko framework in the elasticity method remain unclear. Here, we attempt to address this issue by validating the performance of elasticity methods derived from two analytical Budyko equations (Fu's equation and Choudhury's equation), as well as one empirical Budyko equation (Wang-Tang's equation) of the Budyko framework across 22 basins in China. Validations show that the runoff change simulated by the elasticity method derived from the empirical equation has lower errors compared with the two analytical Budyko equations. Results reveal that in the semi-humid environment, the alteration of basin characteristics takes the main responsibility for the runoff change. However, a clear divergence was found in simulated runoff changes among different Budyko-based elasticity methods in humid basins. For parts of the humid basin, the precipitation is the main driver of runoff change from the analytical Budyko-based elasticity methods, while the alteration of basin characteristics is the main derive of the runoff changes according to based on the empirical Budyko-based elasticity method. This difference could be attributed to the variations in the simulated contributions from the alteration of basin characteristics on runoff changes. Generally, our results highlight the importance of validating different Budyko equations when applying the elasticity method to investigate the driver of the runoff changes in humid regions. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect