How the launch of a new journal in 1904 may have changed the relationship between psychology and philosophy
| Autor: | Ingo Feinerer, Christopher D. Green |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
History
Identity (social science) 050109 social psychology Philosophy education Philosophy of computer science Psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 0601 history and archaeology Sociology Western philosophy Social science General Psychology Critical psychology 05 social sciences History 19th Century 06 humanities and the arts History 20th Century Philosophy of psychology United States Epistemology Philosophy 060105 history of science technology & medicine Bibliometrics Periodicals as Topic Theoretical psychology Psychology Philosophy and Physiology |
| Zdroj: | History of Psychology. 20:72-91 |
| ISSN: | 1939-0610 1093-4510 |
| Popis: | Recent research has used networks of scholarly journal articles to investigate the intellectual structure of the discipline of psychology from the later 1880s to the early 1920s. Here, instead, we examined the networks of philosophical journals that were closely aligned with psychology-The Monist, Philosophical Review, and The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods-between 1890 and 1913. We discovered that, although the first 2 of these journals published a great deal of psychologically relevant material up to 1903, material of that sort seemed to evaporate after the launch of the third journal in 1904. It was not so much that material migrated from the old journals to the new one. It was rather that the new journal was able to attract new trends in American philosophical psychology, while interest in traditional approaches seemed to dry up. The result was that psychology moved into a new and expansive era, while America philosophy was left somewhat destabilized as it attempted to reconfigure its disciplinary identity. (PsycINFO Database Record |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|