Value of colchicine as treatment for recurrent oral ulcers: A systematic review
| Autor: | Alessio Gambino, Roberto Broccoletti, Paolo G. Arduino, Savino Sciascia, Marco Cabras, Marco Carrozzo, Simone Baldovino |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty PFAPA syndrome Dapsone Placebo Recurrent aphthous stomatitis Behçet disease Pathology and Forensic Medicine law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine systematic review Randomized controlled trial Lymphadenitis law Internal medicine medicine Humans Oral Ulcer Stomatitis treatment business.industry Reproducibility of Results 030206 dentistry medicine.disease Thalidomide colchicine oral ulcers Otorhinolaryngology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Prednisolone Periodontics Stomatitis Aphthous Oral Surgery Colchicine business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 49:731-740 |
| ISSN: | 1600-0714 0904-2512 |
| Popis: | Background In oral medicine, colchicine is a therapeutic alternative for idiopathic recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), Behcet disease (BD), periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome, and mouth and genitals ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC) syndrome. The present review aims to evaluate reliability of colchicine against recurrent oral ulcers. Methods A systematic review was conducted, with the following PICO (Patient, Intervention, Control, Outcome) question: "In populations with idiopathic or secondary recurrent oral ulcers, is colchicine more effective in improving pain and accelerating healing, compared to other intervention or placebo?" Results Seven RCTs and 3 OCTs were considered eligible. Four RCTs focused on BD, two RCTs and three OCTs on RAS, and one RCT on PFAPA syndrome. Heterogeneity between RCTs prevented from meta-analysis. Regarding BD, no significant difference between colchicine and placebo was found in two of three placebo-controlled RCTs, whereas the third RCT showed benefit. A comparative RCT found ciclosporin more effective than colchicine for oral lesions of BD. One open-label RCT showed promising but partial results on colchicine in reducing PFAPA attacks, when compared to corticosteroids. Concerning RAS, colchicine appeared less effective than clofazimine, thalidomide and dapsone, and with outcomes similar to low-dosage corticosteroids but higher gastric discomfort than prednisolone. One OCT reported positive results compared with no treatment but a RCT found no difference with placebo. Conclusion Role of colchicine as treatment for idiopathic or secondary recurrent oral ulcers is still controversial. Further standardized RCTs and crossover trials are needed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text