What do we know about SARS-CoV-2 transmission? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the secondary attack rate and associated risk factors
Autor: | Roberta Pastore, Lin Naing, Mohammad Fathi Alikhan, Sirajul Adli Jamaludin, Muhammad Ali Rosledzana, Wee Chian Koh, Matthew M. Griffith, Faezah Amin, Asiah Omar, Alia Shazli, Justin Wong, Liling Chaw |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
RNA viruses
0301 basic medicine Epidemiology Coronaviruses Geographical Locations Mathematical and Statistical Techniques 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors United States COVID-19 Medical risk factors SARS CoV 2 Virus testing China Metaanalysis Medical personnel Retrospective studies Medicine and Health Sciences Medicine Medical Personnel 030212 general & internal medicine Transmission risks and rates Child Index case Pathology and laboratory medicine Virus Testing Multidisciplinary Statistics Medical microbiology Random effects model Professions Research Design Meta-analysis Quarantine Viruses Physical Sciences Disease Susceptibility Pathogens Coronavirus Infections Research Article Adult Funnel plot Asia SARS coronavirus Health Personnel Science Pneumonia Viral 030106 microbiology Research and Analysis Methods Microbiology Betacoronavirus 03 medical and health sciences Diagnostic Medicine Humans Family Statistical Methods Pandemics Retrospective Studies Biology and life sciences SARS-CoV-2 business.industry Organisms Viral pathogens Publication bias Confidence interval Microbial pathogens Medical Risk Factors People and Places North America Population Groupings business Mathematics Contact tracing Demography |
Zdroj: | PLOS ONE, 15(10):e0240205 PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 10, p e0240205 (2020) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0240205 |
Popis: | IntroductionCurrent SARS-CoV-2 containment measures rely on controlling viral transmission. Effective prioritization can be determined by understanding SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of the secondary attack rate (SAR) in household and healthcare settings. We also examined whether household transmission differed by symptom status of index case, adult and children, and relationship to index case.MethodsWe searched PubMed, medRxiv, and bioRxiv databases between January 1 and July 25, 2020. High-quality studies presenting original data for calculating point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included. Random effects models were constructed to pool SAR in household and healthcare settings. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's meta-regression test.Results43 studies met the inclusion criteria for household SAR, 18 for healthcare SAR, and 17 for other settings. The pooled household SAR was 18.1% (95% CI: 15.7%, 20.6%), with significant heterogeneity across studies ranging from 3.9% to 54.9%. SAR of symptomatic index cases was higher than asymptomatic cases (RR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.46, 7.14). Adults showed higher susceptibility to infection than children (RR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.17). Spouses of index cases were more likely to be infected compared to other household contacts (RR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.79, 3.19). In healthcare settings, SAR was estimated at 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4%, 1.0%).DiscussionWhile aggressive contact tracing strategies may be appropriate early in an outbreak, as it progresses, measures should transition to account for setting-specific transmission risk. Quarantine may need to cover entire communities while tracing shifts to identifying transmission hotspots and vulnerable populations. Where possible, confirmed cases should be isolated away from the household. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |