Use of computerized campimetry and/or optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis by non-glaucoma specialists
| Autor: | Cláudia Gomide Vilela de Sousa Franco, Leopoldo Magacho, Marcos Pereira de Ávila |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Tomography optical coherence Optic disk Glaucoma Diagnostic accuracy Materials testing Retinography Visual field tests Optical coherence tomography Ophthalmology Humans Medicine Testes de campo visual Campimetry medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry General Medicine RE1-994 medicine.disease Variações dependentes do observador Observer variation Tomografia de coerência óptica Disco óptico Patient examination Visual Fields business Specialization |
| Zdroj: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Vol 84, Iss 2, Pp 113-120 (2021) Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Volume: 84, Issue: 2, Pages: 113-120, Published: 03 FEB 2021 Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.84 n.2 2021 Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO) instacron:CBO |
| ISSN: | 1678-2925 |
| Popis: | Purpose: To compare the use of visual field and/or optical coherence tomography (OCT) combined with color retinography by non-glaucoma specialists for differentiating glaucoma from physiological cupping. Methods: Eighty patients with glaucoma or physiological cupping (40 of each) were randomized according to the examination used (GI: color retinography, GII: color retinography + visual field, GIII: color retinography + optical coherence tomography, GIV: color retinography + visual field + optical coherence tomography). Twenty non-specialist ophthalmologists diagnosed glaucoma from PowerPoint slide images, without direct patient examination. Results: Inter-examiner agreement was good for GII (ĸ: 0.63; 95%CI, 0.53-0.72), moderate for GIII (ĸ: 0.58; 95%CI, 0.48-0.68) and GIV (ĸ: 0.41; 95%CI, 0.31-0.51), and low for GI (ĸ: 0.30; 95%CI, 0.20-0.39) (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|