Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study
Autor: | Hanife Ataoglu, Sema Belli, Keziban Olcay |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Selçuk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi., Ataoglu, Hanife., Belli, Sema. |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Molar Adolescent Cross-sectional study Root canal Perforation (oil well) Dentistry Treatment failure Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine stomatognathic system Apical surgery 0502 economics and business medicine Humans Treatment Failure Child General Dentistry Aged Aged 80 and over Tooth Nonvital Related factors business.industry 05 social sciences 030206 dentistry Middle Aged Root Canal Therapy failure stomatognathic diseases Cross-Sectional Studies medicine.anatomical_structure extraction root canal treatment Female 050211 marketing Smoking status retreatment business Endodontically treated teeth |
Zdroj: | Journal of Endodontics. 44:38-45 |
ISSN: | 0099-2399 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029 |
Popis: | WOS: 000418878600007 PubMed: 29246376 Introduction: The aim of this study was to review the factors related to the failure and extraction of unsuccessful endodontically treated teeth. Methods: A total of 1000 teeth treated with nonsurgical root canal therapy were analyzed, and the following information was recorded for each patient: reasons for failure and extraction, type of tooth, presence and type of coronal restoration, smoking status, age, gender, and level of education. One main reason was recorded for each failed tooth. The associations between reasons for failure, patient, and tooth were tested by using chi(2) analysis. Results: Of the 1000 endodontically failed teeth analyzed in this study, 28.1% (n = 281) were extracted, 66% (n = 660) were re-treated, and 5.9% (n = 59) were treated with apical surgery. Among the reasons for failure, restorative and endodontic reasons were seen most frequently (43.9%, n = 439), whereas orthodontic reasons were seldom seen (0.1%, n = 1). The most common reason for extraction was for prosthetic reasons (40.8%), and perforation/stripping was the least common (2.9%). The mandibular first molars were the most frequently extracted teeth (27.4%, n = 77). Conclusions: The most common reason for the extraction of endodontically treated teeth was for prosthetic reasons. Among the reasons for failure, restorative and endodontic reasons were the most frequently seen, and orthodontic reasons were the most seldom. The teeth that failed most frequently were mandibular first molars, and the teeth that failed least frequently were maxillary third molars. The most common reason for the extraction of failed endodontically treated teeth was for prosthetic reasons. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Selcuk University (BAP), Konya, Turkey [11202018] The study has been supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Selcuk University (BAP), Konya, Turkey (project number: 11202018). This study was performed in Endodontics and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Departments of Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |