The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development
Autor: | Peter Bias, Martin Schiestl, Julie Maréchal-Jamil, Gopinath M. Ranganna, Björn Capsius, Karsten Roth, Byoungin Jung, Michael Trieb, Keith Watson |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Review Article Marketing authorization 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Drug Development Drug approval Humans Medicine media_common.cataloged_instance Pharmacology (medical) European Union Clinical efficacy European union Intensive care medicine Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals Drug Approval media_common 030203 arthritis & rheumatology Pharmacology Licensure Public information United States Food and Drug Administration Manufacturing process business.industry Biosimilar General Medicine United States 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis business Biotechnology |
Zdroj: | Biodrugs |
ISSN: | 1179-190X 1173-8804 |
Popis: | Since the first approval of a biosimilar medicinal product in 2006, scientific understanding of the features and development of biosimilar medicines has accumulated. This review scrutinizes public information on development programs and the contribution of the clinical studies for biosimilar approval in the European Union (EU) and/or the United States (US) until November 2019. The retrospective evaluation of the programs that eventually obtained marketing authorization and/or licensure revealed that in 95% (36 out of 38) of all programs, the comparative clinical efficacy studies confirmed similarity. In the remaining 5% (2 out of 38), despite meeting efficacy outcomes, the biosimilar candidates exhibited clinical differences in immunogenicity that required changes to the manufacturing process and additional clinical studies to enable biosimilar approval. Both instances of clinical differences in immunogenicity occurred prior to 2010, and the recurrence of these cases is unlikely today due to state-of-the-art assays and improved control of process-related impurities. Biosimilar candidates that were neither approved in the EU nor in the US were not approved due to reasons other than clinical confirmation of efficacy. This review of the development history of biosimilars allows the proposal of a more efficient and expedited biosimilar development without the routine need for comparative clinical efficacy and/or pharmacodynamic studies and without any compromise in quality, safety, or efficacy. This proposal is scientifically valid, consistent with regulation of all biologics, and maintains robust regulatory standards in the assessment of biosimilar candidates. Note: The findings and conclusion of this paper are limited to biosimilar products developed against the regulatory standards in the EU and the US. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-020-00422-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |