Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study
Autor: | Rosella P.M.G. Hermens, Laura Ouwerkerk, Mallory Woiski, Arno van Heijst, Marije Hogeveen, Jos M. T. Draaisma, Rosa Geurtzen, Hubertina C.J. Scheepers |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine, Obstetrie & Gynaecologie, MUMC+: MA Medische Staf Obstetrie Gynaecologie (9) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Counseling
Male Pediatrics Prenatal counseling Personalization 0302 clinical medicine Neonatologists PARENTS Pregnancy Professional-Family Relations Health care Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Qualitative Research Netherlands Prenatal Care Focus Groups Middle Aged Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17] Obstetrics Premature Birth Original Article Female Infant Premature Adult Limits of viability medicine.medical_specialty Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Decision-Making EXTREME PREMATURITY Perinatal care Delivery room care INTENSIVE-CARE Directive Counseling EXTREMELY PRETERM BIRTH Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] 03 medical and health sciences DELIVERY Nursing Physicians 030225 pediatrics Intensive care Humans business.industry Other Research Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 0] Infant Newborn Focus group EXTREMELY PREMATURE-INFANTS HIGH-RISK PERINATAL-CARE Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health HEALTH-CARE Intensive Care Neonatal Quality of Life business SHARED DECISION-MAKING Decision making |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Pediatrics, 176(8), 1107-1119. Springer, Cham European Journal of Pediatrics, 176, 1107-1119 European Journal of Pediatrics, 176, 8, pp. 1107-1119 European Journal of Pediatrics |
ISSN: | 0340-6199 |
Popis: | Contains fulltext : 177240.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Prenatal counseling practices at the limits of viability do vary, and constructing a counseling framework based on guidelines, professional and parental preferences, might achieve more homogeneity. We aimed to gain insight into professionals' preferences on three domains of counseling, particularly content, organization, and decision making and their influencing factors. A qualitative, nationwide in-depth exploration among Dutch perinatal professionals by semi-structured interviews in focus groups was performed. Regarding content of prenatal counseling, preparing parents on the short-term situation (delivery room care) and revealing their perspectives on "quality of life" were considered important. Parents should be informed on the kind of decision, on the difficulty of individual outcome predictions, on survival and mortality figures, short- and long-term morbidity, and the burden of hospitalization. For organization, the making of and compliance with agreements between professionals may promote joint counseling by neonatologists and obstetricians. Supportive materials were considered useful but only when up-to-date, in addition to the discussion and with opportunity for personalization. Regarding decision making, it is not always clear to parents that a prenatal decision needs to be made and they can participate, influencing factors could be, e.g., unclear language, directive counseling, overload of information, and an immediate delivery. There is limited familiarity with shared decision making although it is the preferred model. CONCLUSION: This study gained insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal counseling at the limits of viability and their influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. What is Known: * Heterogeneity in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability exists * Differences between preferred counseling and actual practice also exists What is New: * Insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal periviability counseling and its influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. Results should be taken into account when performing counseling. * Particularly the understanding of true shared decision making needs to be improved. Furthermore, implementation of shared decision making in daily practice needs more attention. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |