A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need?
Autor: | Alfons van Impelen, Marko Jelicic, Isabella J. M. Niesten, Angel Manderson, Minyi Cheng, Harald Merckelbach |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Section Forensic Psychology, RS: FPN CPS IV, RS: FdR Strafrecht en Criminologie, RS: FdR Institute MICS |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
050103 clinical psychology
media_common.quotation_subject symptom validity feigning 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Symptom exaggeration Malingering Cognitive dissonance medicine DECEPTION 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE FAKING media_common cognitive dissonance 05 social sciences ATTRIBUTION Deception medicine.disease simulation designs Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology malingering Psychology Attribution 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Cognitive psychology |
Zdroj: | Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 8(1), 55-75. Textrum |
ISSN: | 2043-8087 |
DOI: | 10.5127/jep.051815 |
Popis: | This article reflects on the current state of the art in research on individuals who exaggerate their symptoms (i.e., feigning). We argue that the most commonly used approach in this field, namely simply providing research participants with instructions to overreport symptoms, is valuable for validating measures that tap into symptom exaggeration, but is less suitable for addressing the theoretical foundations of feigning. That is, feigning serves to actively mislead others and is done deliberately. These characteristics produce experiences (e.g., feelings of guilt) in individuals who feign that lab research in its current form is unable to accommodate for. Paradigms that take these factors into account may not only yield more ecologically valid data, but may also stimulate a shift from the study of how to detect feigning to more fundamental issues. One such issue is the cognitive dissonance (e.g., feelings of guilt) that - in some cases - accompanies feigning and that may foster internalized fabrications. We present three studies (N's = 78, 60, and 54) in which we tried to abate current issues and discuss their merits for future research. (C) Copyright 2016 Textrum Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |