Practical Challenges and Methodological Flexibility in Prior Elicitation
| Autor: | Angelika Stefan, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Nathan J. Evans |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Psychologische Methodenleer (Psychologie, FMG), Psychology Other Research (FMG) |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Process (engineering)
Computer science Best practice Bayesian probability bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Quantitative Psychology 02 engineering and technology PsycINFO 050905 science studies Prior probability 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Humans PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Statistical Methods Flexibility (engineering) Frequentist probability bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology 05 social sciences Foundation (evidence) Bayes Theorem 020207 software engineering Data science PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Design PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology other bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences Psychology (miscellaneous) PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods 0509 other social sciences |
| Zdroj: | Psychological Methods, 27(2), 177-197. American Psychological Association |
| ISSN: | 1082-989X |
| Popis: | The Bayesian statistical framework requires the specification of prior distributions, which reflect predata knowledge about the relative plausibility of different parameter values. As prior distributions influence the results of Bayesian analyses, it is important to specify them with care. Prior elicitation has frequently been proposed as a principled method for deriving prior distributions based on expert knowledge. Although prior elicitation provides a theoretically satisfactory method of specifying prior distributions, there are several implicit decisions that researchers need to make at different stages of the elicitation process, each of them constituting important researcher degrees of freedom. Here, we discuss some of these decisions and group them into 3 categories: decisions about (a) the setup of the prior elicitation; (b) the core elicitation process; and (c) combination of elicited prior distributions from different experts. Importantly, different decision paths could result in greatly varying priors elicited from the same experts. Hence, researchers who wish to perform prior elicitation are advised to carefully consider each of the practical decisions before, during, and after the elicitation process. By explicitly outlining the consequences of these practical decisions, we hope to raise awareness for methodological flexibility in prior elicitation and provide researchers with a more structured approach to navigate the decision paths in prior elicitation. Making the decisions explicit also provides the foundation for further research that can identify evidence-based best practices that may eventually reduce the methodologically flexibility in prior elicitation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|