The role of knowledge in greening flood protection. Lessons from the Dutch case study future Afsluitdijk
| Autor: | Jan van Tatenhove, Arthur P.J. Mol, Henriëtte Otter, Stephanie K.H. Janssen |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Process management
Intensive interaction Process (engineering) WASS netherlands Management Monitoring Policy and Law Aquatic Science Oceanography information Domain (software engineering) water management science search Sustainable development Milieubeleid WIMEK region sustainable development Flood myth business.industry Realisation Environmental resource management projects dynamics Environmental Policy Conceptual framework Knowledge base business policy |
| Zdroj: | Janssen, S K H, Mol, A P J, Van Tatenhove, J P M & Otter, H S 2014, ' The role of knowledge in greening flood protection. Lessons from the Dutch case study future Afsluitdijk ', Ocean and Coastal Management, vol. 95, pp. 219-232 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.015 Ocean & Coastal Management 95 (2014) Ocean & Coastal Management, 95, 219-232 |
| ISSN: | 0964-5691 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.015 |
| Popis: | Greening flood protection (GFP) is an upcoming approach in coastal protection knowledge and policy. The central notion of this multifunctional concept is that natural processes, nature development and the dynamics of ecosystems are taken into account in realising flood protection. In practice, implementation of GFP is faced with multiple barriers, of which some are strongly related to knowledge. In this paper we aim to further our understanding of the realisation of GFP in projects by focussing on the role of knowledge and specifically looking at the interaction between knowledge related to different policy fields. We analyse under what conditions knowledge can enable GFP in projects. We apply a conceptual framework of knowledge arrangements (KAs)—drawing attention to the policy fields and the knowledge base— on the Dutch flood protection project Future Afsluitdijk. While the project aimed at more than just flood protection, this was not achieved. The case serves as an illustrative example of the struggle to organise knowledge processes for an integrated, greening flood protection design. We identify four main lessons on the role of knowledge: (1) knowledge development should take place at close distance to the policy process and include intensive interaction, (2) multiple design iterations are needed, (3) integration at policy level requires structural embedding to endure, and (4) tools are required that allow for an integrated assessment. Interestingly, the failure of integration between KAs within the project led to the development and re-organisation of the nature domain. As a result nature actors managed to pursue their goals, but in a different arena. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect