Evaluation of the molecular bacterial load assay for detecting viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cerebrospinal fluid before and during tuberculous meningitis treatment

Autor: Wilber Sabiiti, Hoang Thanh Hai, Guy E. Thwaites, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong, Do Dang Anh Thu, Stephen H. Gillespie
Přispěvatelé: University of St Andrews. Infection and Global Health Division, University of St Andrews. School of Medicine, University of St Andrews. Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosis, University of St Andrews. Centre for Biophotonics, University of St Andrews. Global Health Implementation Group, University of St Andrews. Gillespie Group, University of St Andrews. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Popis: Funding: This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (206724/Z/17/Z to NTTT and 106680/B/14/Z to GT). New tools to monitor treatment response and predict outcome from tuberculous meningitis (TBM) are urgently required. We retrospectively evaluated the 16S rRNA-based molecular bacterial load assay (MBLA) to quantify viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from adults with TBM. 187 CSF samples were collected before and during the first two months of treatment from 99 adults TBM, comprising 56 definite, 43 probable or possible TBM, and 18 non-TBM and preserved at −80 °C prior to MBLA. We compared MBLA against MGIT culture, GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear. Before treatment, MBLA was positive in 34/99 (34.3%), significantly lower than MGIT 47/99 (47.5%), Xpert 51/99 (51.5%) and ZN smear 55/99 (55.5%). After one month of treatment, MBLA and MGIT were positive in 3/38 (7.9%) and 4/38 (10.5%), respectively, whereas Xpert and ZN smear remained positive in 19/38 (50.0%) and 18/38 (47.4%). In summary, MBLA was less likely to detect CSF bacteria before the start of treatment compared with MGIT culture, Xpert and ZN smear. MBLA and MGIT positivity fell during treatment because of detecting only viable bacteria, whereas Xpert and ZN smear remained positive for longer because of detecting both live and dead bacteria. Sample storage and processing may have reduced MBLA-detectable viable bacteria; and sampling earlier in treatment may yield more useful results. Prospective studies with CSF sampling after 1–2 weeks are warranted. Publisher PDF
Databáze: OpenAIRE