Outcome comparison among working adults with centralizing low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up
| Autor: | Markku Paatelma, Sinikka Kilpikoski, Riitta Simonen, Tapio Videman, Markku Alen, Ari Heinonen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2009 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Activities of daily living Visual analogue scale business.industry Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 1 year follow up Low back pain Treatment period law.invention Randomized controlled trial law Secondary analysis medicine Physical therapy Manual therapy medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Advances in Physiotherapy. 11:210-217 |
| ISSN: | 1651-1948 1403-8196 |
| DOI: | 10.3109/14038190902963087 |
| Popis: | Our purpose was to examine if adults with centralizing pain might achieve better treatment outcomes when treated by individually designed therapy than “given advice only to stay active”. One hundred and nineteen working adults with first or a recurrent episode of low back pain (LBP) were classified as centralizers and were randomly allocated to orthopaedic manual therapy (OMT; n=42), the McKenzie (n=48) or “advice only to stay active” (Advice-only; n=29) groups. Back and leg pain were assessed by the visual analogue scale, disability with the Roland–Morris questionnaire and functional status with an activities of daily living (ADL) index. Immediately after the treatment period, LBP decreased significantly more in the McKenzie group than in Advice-only group. At 3 months, leg pain and LBP decreased significantly more in the McKenzie group than in the Advice-only group, respectively. At 6 months, leg pain LBP had decreased significantly more in the OMT and McKenzie groups than in the Advice-only group. Func... |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |