Trials

Autor: Regan, Jemma, Frison, Eric, Collin, Fidéline, Dawes, Piers, Hann, Mark, Himmelsbach, Ines, Hooper, Emma, Reeves, David, Simkin, Zoe, Thodi, Chryssoula, Yang, Fan, Leroi, Iracema, Abrams, Harvey, Chaghil-Boissière, Nathalie, Charalambous, Pavlina, Constantinidou, Fofi, Gilbert, Camille, Helmer, Catherine, Jury, Francine, Kontogianni, Evangelia, Lawlor, Brian, Matard, Charly, Montecelo, Susana, Marie, Sarah, Politis, Antonios, Postea, Otilia, Renaud, David, Termote, Monique, Wolski, Lucas
Přispěvatelé: Bordeaux population health (BPH), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie et de Développement (ISPED)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Constantinidou, Fofi [0000-0002-7928-8363], Thodi, Chryssoula [0000-0002-2388-9370], Leroi, Iracema [0000-0003-1822-3643], Dawes, Piers [0000-0003-3180-9884]
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Vision
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cathie Marsh Institute
LEHA
law.invention
Study Protocol
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Hearing
law
Outcome Assessment
Health Care

Clinical endpoint
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Pharmacology (medical)
030212 general & internal medicine
Functional ability
Hearing Disorders
EUCLID
Aged
80 and over

F-CRIN
Sensory intervention
lcsh:R5-920
Informed Consent
Cognition
3. Good health
Test (assessment)
Europe
Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing
USMR
lcsh:Medicine (General)
Quality of life
medicine.medical_specialty
ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/MICRA
Vision Disorders
03 medical and health sciences
Quality of life (healthcare)
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
Intervention (counseling)
Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
medicine
Humans
Dementia
Psychosocial intervention
Aged
business.industry
Patient Selection
medicine.disease
Sample Size
ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/cathie_marsh_institute
[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Trials, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2019)
Regan, J, Frison, E, Collin, F, Dawes, P, Hann, M, Himmelsbach, I, Hooper, E, Reeves, D, Simkin, Z, Thodi, C, Yang, F, Leroi, I, Abrams, H, Chaghil-Boissière, N, Charalambous, P, Constantinidou, F, Gilbert, C, Helmer, C, Jury, F, Kontogianni, E, Lawlor, B, Matard, C, Montecelo, S, Marie, S, Politis, A, Postea, O, Renaud, D, Termote, M & Wolski, L 2019, ' Individualised sensory intervention to improve quality of life in people with dementia and their companions (SENSE-Cog trial) : Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial ', Trials, vol. 20, no. 1, 80 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2973-0
Trials
Trials, BioMed Central, In press, 20 (1), pp.80. ⟨10.1186/s13063-018-2973-0⟩
ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2973-0
Popis: Background Hearing and vision impairments are highly prevalent in people with dementia and may have a negative impact on quality of life and other dementia-related outcomes. Intervening to optimise sensory impairment and support sensory function may be a means of improving dementia-related outcomes. The SENSE-Cog trial will test whether a home-based multi-part sensory intervention is effective in improving quality of life and other key outcomes in people with dementia and hearing or vision problems (or both) and their companions. Methods This is an European, multi-centre, observer-blind, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Three hundred fifty four people with dementia and hearing or vision impairment (or both) and their companions will be randomly assigned to receive either “care as usual” or a multi-component sensory intervention including assessment and correction of hearing or vision impairments (or both), home-based (maximum 10 visits over 18 weeks), therapist-delivered sensory support (that is, adherence to devices; improving the sensory environment (that is, lighting), communication training, and sign-posting to other support agencies). Change from baseline to intervention end (18 weeks) and post-intervention (36 weeks) will be compared between the two arms in the following outcomes: quality of life (primary endpoint), sensory and cognitive functional ability, relationships, mental well-being, health resource utilisation and cost-effectiveness. Discussion This is one of two articles outlining the SENSE-Cog trial. Here, we describe the protocol for the effectiveness of the SENSE-Cog intervention. A parallel and complementary process evaluation will be described elsewhere. If the SENSE-Cog trial demonstrates that the sensory intervention improves outcomes in dementia, we will make a toolkit of training materials, resources and information available to health and social care providers to implement the intervention in routine practice. This will be a significant contribution to the therapeutic management of people with dementia and sensory impairment. Trial registration ISRCTN (Trial ID: ISRCTN17056211) on 19 February 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2973-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Databáze: OpenAIRE