Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm

Autor: Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark, Lars Erik Rutqvist, B A Hemming Johansson, Per-Ebbe Jönsson, Mats Breivald, Ulrik Ringborg, Lennart Krysander, Christian Ingvar, Christer Lindholm, Ronny Andersson
Rok vydání: 2000
Předmět:
Zdroj: Cancer. 89:1495-1501
ISSN: 1097-0142
0008-543X
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1495::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-d
Popis: Large, prospective, randomized trials with long term follow-up are required to obtain an unbiased evaluation of the significance of resection margins in patients with cutaneous melanoma.The Swedish Melanoma Study Group performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of patients with primary melanoma located on trunk or extremities and with a tumor thickness0.8 mm and/= 2 mm. Patients were allocated randomly to a 2-cm excision margin or a 5-cm excision margin. In total, 989 patients were recruited during the period 1982-1991. The median follow-up was 11 years (range, 7-17 years) for estimation of survival and 8 years (range, 0-17 years) for evaluation of recurrent disease.The crude rate of local recurrence, defined as a recurrence in the scar or transplant, was1% (8 of 989 patients). Twenty percent of the patients (194 of 989 patients) experienced any disease recurrence, and 15% (146 of 989 patients) died of melanoma. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms. In a multivariate Cox analysis with patients allocated to wide excision as the reference group, the estimated relative hazards for overall survival and recurrence free survival among those allocated to a 2-cm resection margin were 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.24), and 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.30), respectively.In this long term follow-up study, local recurrences were found to be rare among patients with tumors0.8 mm thick and/= 2.0 mm thick. No difference in recurrence rate or survival between the two treatment groups was found. Patients in this category can be treated with a resection margin of 2 cm as safely as with a resection margin of 5 cm.
Databáze: OpenAIRE