Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial

Autor: Charles Barbiere, Rick A. Esposito, William G. Henderson, Venki Paramesh, Steven P. Sedlis, Sarah Vernon, Jerome Sacks, Walter G. Wolfe, Kodangudi B. Ramanathan, Darryl Weiman, Jorge Saucedo, Douglass A. Morrison, Frederick G.P. Welt, David C. Booth, Frederick L. Grover, Tamim Antakli, Gulshan K. Sethi, John C. Lucke, Mitchell W. Krucoff, Vladimir Birjiniuk, Daniel W. Lewis, Stuart Pett, Sundeep Mediratta
Rok vydání: 2001
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 38:143-149
ISSN: 0735-1097
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01366-3
Popis: BACKGROUNDPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are being applied to high-risk populations, but previous randomized trials comparing revascularization methods have excluded a number of important high-risk groups.OBJECTIVESThis five-year, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare long-term survival among patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and a high risk of adverse outcomes assigned to either a CABG or a PCI strategy, which could include stents.METHODSPatients from 16 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers were screened to identify myocardial ischemia refractory to medical management and the presence of one or more risk factors for adverse outcome with CABG, including prior open-heart surgery, age >70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction
Databáze: OpenAIRE