Response to Shah et al
Autor: | S Trikha, C Macgregor, M N Jeffrey, James F Kirwan |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Eye. 27:893-893 |
ISSN: | 1476-5454 0950-222X |
DOI: | 10.1038/eye.2013.68 |
Popis: | Sir, We thank Shah et al1 for their interest in the Portsmouth Glaucoma Refinement Scheme.2 The scheme also uses Van Herick grading for anterior chamber depth—all patients with a Van Herick peripheral limbal anterior chamber depth of less than 25% of corneal thickness were referred to the virtual clinic for assessment by an ophthalmologist. Approximately 10% of all of those accepted from the Refinement Scheme virtual clinic to HES (from a total of 11 out of 100 referred to the virtual clinic, from our audit) were due to narrow angles suspected through Van Herick grading. Of these, 25% subsequently required laser peripheral iridotomy, slightly higher than the 17% positive predictive value, for the suggestion of occludable angles by an initial Van Herick test, outlined by Foster.3 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |