Managed Aquifer Recharge at a Farm Level: Evaluating the Performance of Direct Well Recharge Structures
| Autor: | Pradeep Singh, Yogita Dashora, Peter Dillon, Basant L Maheshwari, Anupama Kumar, Prahlad Soni |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Hydrology
lcsh:TD201-500 Irrigation lcsh:Hydraulic engineering Geography Planning and Development India Groundwater recharge Aquatic Science groundwater recharge Total dissolved solids Biochemistry water quality rainwater harvesting Rainwater harvesting Water level stomatognathic diseases lcsh:Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes recharge performance lcsh:TC1-978 Environmental science Water quality Turbidity Surface runoff water level monitoring Water Science and Technology |
| Zdroj: | Water Volume 12 Issue 4 Water, Vol 12, Iss 1069, p 1069 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2073-4441 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/w12041069 |
| Popis: | A field study evaluated the performance of direct well recharge structures (DWRS) in order to harvest and filter farm runoff and its discharge into open dug wells to augment groundwater recharge. This was undertaken between 2016 and 2018 using a total of 11 wells in the Dharta watershed, situated in a semi-arid hardrock region of Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India. The depth to water level in each DWRS well was monitored weekly for 1 to 3 years before and after the DWRS was established, and water samples were taken for water quality analysis (pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), turbidity, fluoride, and Escherichia coli) before and during the monsoon period. For each DWRS well, two control wells in close proximity were also monitored and sampled. Five of the DWRS established in 2018 also had flow meters installed in order to measure discharge from the filter to the well. The volume of water recharged through DWRS into individual wells during the 2018 monsoon ranged from 2 to 176 m3 per well. Although the mean rise in water levels over the monsoon was higher in DWRS wells than in nearby control wells, the difference was not significant. Values of pH, EC, TDS, and F decreased in DWRS and control wells as each monsoon progressed, whereas the turbidity of wells with DWRS increased slightly. There was no significant difference between DWRS and control wells for pH, EC/TDS, turbidity, or fluoride. The presence of E. coli in DWRS wells was higher than in control wells, however, E. coli exceeded drinking water guidelines in all sampled wells. On the basis of this study, it is recommended that rural runoff should not be admitted to wells that are used for, or close to, wells used for drinking water supplies, even though salinity and fluoride concentrations may be reduced. For this study, none of the 11 DWRS wells produced sufficient additional recharge to potentially increase dry season irrigation supplies to justify expenditure on DWRS. This even applies to the DWRS well adjacent to a small ephemeral stream that had a significantly larger catchment area than those drawing on farmers&rsquo fields alone. An important and unexpected finding of this study was that no sampled open dug well met drinking water standards. This has led to a shift in local priorities to implement well-head water quality protection measures for wells used for drinking water supplies. It is recommended that parapet walls be built around the perimeter of such dug wells, as well as having covers be installed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|