Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long‐term comparison
| Autor: | Gerd Hasenfuss, Klaudia Stella Schlögl, Markus Zabel, Helge Haarmann, Simon Schlögl, Philipp Bengel, Eva C.L. Rasenack, Leonard Bergau |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation medicine.medical_treatment Ablation of atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Pericardial effusion Pulmonary vein Magnetics 03 medical and health sciences Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine Recurrence Risk Factors Atrial Fibrillation Humans Medicine Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine business.industry Remote magnetic navigation Atrial fibrillation General Medicine Middle Aged Ablation medicine.disease 3. Good health Catheter Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Nuclear medicine |
| Zdroj: | Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 45:14-22 |
| ISSN: | 1540-8159 0147-8389 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Data comparing remote magnetic catheter navigation (RMN) with manual catheter navigation (MCN) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is lacking. The aim of the present prospective observational study was to compare the outcome of RMN versus (vs.) MCN ablation of AF with regards to AF recurrence. METHODS The study comprised 667 consecutive patients with a total of 939 procedures: 287 patients were ablated using RMN, 380 using MCN. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline. After 2.3 ± 2.3 years of follow-up, 23% of the patients in the MCN group remained free of AF recurrence compared to 13% in the RMN group (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text